管理層發言
Thank you for standing by. Good afternoon. My name is Julie, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Silvercorp First Quarter Fiscal 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. I would now like to turn the conference over to Lon Shaver, President of Silvercorp. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Julie. On behalf of Silvercorp, I'd like to welcome everyone to the call this morning. Today, we'll discuss our first quarter fiscal 2025 financial results which were released yesterday after the close of the market. A copy of the news release, our MD&A and financial statements are available on our website and SEDAR+. Before we get going, please note that certain statements on today's call will contain forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. And also please review the cautionary statements in our news release as well as the risk factors described in our most recent regulatory filings. Now to recap our quarterly financial results, we kicked off the fiscal year with record quarterly revenue of $72 million. That was a 20% increase from last year. This growth was driven by a robust commodity market, which led to notable improvements in realized metal prices, particularly in China compared to Q1 of last year.
In particular, the realized silver price rose by 36%, gold by 18%, lead by 18%, and zinc by 23%. Silver remains our most important metal, contributing 63% of our Q1 revenue, followed by lead at 22%. I'll note that silver was 59% of revenue in Q1 of 2024 and 55% of revenue in Q4 of 2024. The results of this quarter reinforce why investors should own our shares, namely demonstrating that we provide leverage to higher metal prices through the response in our financial results. Moving down the income statement, attributable net income for Q1 was $22 million or $0.12 per share. This is up significantly from $9 million or $0.05 per share in Q1 of fiscal 2024. The increase in our bottom line reflects those higher metals prices, partially offset by lower sales volume and higher business expenses related to the Adventus acquisition. On an adjusted basis, excluding the impact of noncash and one-time items, our attributable adjusted net income for the quarter was $21 million or $0.12 per share compared to $12 million or $0.07 per share in Q1 of last year.
Looking at cash flow from operating activities, our mines generated $40 million this past quarter. This is up 38% year-over-year and largely reflects those increased metals prices. But also if we look at cash flow from operations before changes in noncash working capital items, the increase was 65%. Additionally, in the quarter, we invested $20 million in our mines. This is up 23% from last year, largely stemming from increased underground development and tailings storage facility construction activities at Ying. Despite the increase in capital expenditures, we ended the quarter with $216 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, an increase of $31 million from March, our year-end. This position does not include our investments in associates and other companies, which had a total market value of $108 million as of June 30. Turning our attention to our operating results.
As reported in July, our mines performed as expected in Q1. We mined 344,000 tonnes and milled 308,000 tonnes of ore during the quarter, representing year-over-year increases of 13% and 4%, respectively. Despite higher quarterly throughput, our production in silver, lead, and zinc decreased by 4%, 12%, and 6%, respectively, due to lower head grades in the current mine plan. Additionally, we stockpiled 59,000 tonnes of ore at Ying, which will be milled after the Mill No. 2 expansion is completed later this year. We remain confident in achieving our annual production guidance set in April, which, as a reminder, was between 6.8 million to 7.2 million ounces of silver. On the unit cost front, we are also on track. Production costs averaged $80 per tonne in Q1, 2% higher than last year's results but in line with our annual cost guidance of between $77 to $80 per tonne. The increase was mainly due to more mining preparation tunnels and grade control drilling completed and expensed as part of the mining costs in the current quarter.
Our cash cost per ounce of silver net of by-product credits was negative $1.67 in the quarter. That's a significant improvement from a negative $0.31 in the prior year quarter, and this change was driven by higher by-product credits from higher metals prices. All-in sustaining costs. Production costs rose by 4% year-over-year to $140 per tonne in Q1 but remain below our annual cost guidance of between $144 to $152 per tonne. Our all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was $9.82, which is 4% higher than Q1 of last year due to the previously mentioned sustaining capital expenditures. Turning to the Ying growth projects. The Mill No. 2 capacity expansion remains on track and on budget to be completed by November of this year. As a reminder, this project will increase Ying's total production capacity to 4,000 tonnes per day. Construction on the third tailings storage facility is expected to be completed later this year.
With $14 million spent to date, the total cost of construction is expected to be below the original estimate of $38 million. We plan to release an updated Ying technical report imminently. This 43-101 compliant report with an effective date of June 30 will incorporate drilling completed up to the end of 2023, to update reserves and resources as well as provide an updated life of mine plan, including economics. Regarding the Kuanping Project, the environmental assessment report was approved in July, and the remaining mine safety report is pending approval by the province. We expect to commence development in fiscal 2025 and have allocated $1 million for mine construction in this year's budget. Last but not least, after the quarter ended, we successfully completed the acquisition of Adventus Mining on July 31. This is a significant step in our strategy to create a globally diversified green metals producer.
It provides an excellent opportunity to leverage our technical expertise and financial strength to unlock value for all stakeholders through the development of the El Domo project. Also after the acquisition closed, Ecuador's Ministry of Energy and Mines issued the Resolution of Change of Phase for El Domo, a milestone that enables the construction and subsequent operation of the mine. Once in operation, El Domo will make a meaningful contribution to our production profile and financial results while simultaneously adding country and commodity diversification. We are dedicated to working collaboratively with the government of Ecuador, local communities, and Salazar Resources, our in-country partners. Our commitment to modern responsible development will benefit both the local communities and the country as a whole. We intend to provide more indications of our plans for development of the El Domo project in the near future. With that, I'd like to open the call for questions.
分析師問答
Your first question comes from Joseph Reagor from ROTH Capital Partners.
Lon, congrats on a good quarter. So on Adventus, I know you just said that you guys will be providing an update soon. But can you give us kind of like a rough timeline on what we should expect as far as news flow post-acquisition now that it's closed?
Well, as I said, we're going to be putting out an update in terms of what the go-forward plan is. Adventus and the Curi mining team did a great job developing El Domo. And so what we're looking to do is kicking off the advancement of more detailed engineering and other project activities and looking at some of the areas where we can get going with development of the project, early lead time items and certain projects that are going to be necessary to build the mine while we're looking at advancing the status of engineering and potentially fine-tuning some of the other development plans.
Okay, fair enough. Also, you mentioned this Ying technical report that's coming. I think the wording you used was imminently. Will this report be designed to show a full use of the mill or should we expect a certain capacity level utilization?
Well, I think, Joe, you should wait for the report. I don't want to give an advanced view until the actual report is out. But the report does contemplate and factor in the expansion that's underway.
Okay. And remind us, what's the current expectation as far as completion date for the mill?
November.
November, okay...
I think I should add, Joe, the thing is that the mill expansion is only one element of the expansion program. Recall that we're shifting mining methods. We're also looking at getting the permits renewed and extended to allow for an increased throughput rate. And so all of these things have to dovetail together, and this will get covered off in that report.
Your next question comes from Felix Shafigullin from Eight Capital.
Lon, congratulations on a good quarter.
Thanks, Felix.
I have a couple of questions. Regarding the mining costs, which have increased slightly this quarter compared to the same period last year, should we consider this as a one-time occurrence related to additional tunneling and grade control drilling that was expensed? Or is this a concern that may continue into the future? How should we approach this situation?
Well, again, we're so close to a life of mine plan to speak to what are going to be year averages to not be caught up in sort of a quarter-to-quarter basis. We don't think that the uptick that we saw in this quarter is hugely material. So I think I'll just ask for your patience on that report when it's out and we look at sort of more long-term numbers. That's a question we can address at that time.
Okay, all right. So my next question, I mean, I imagine would probably also be addressed in the report but I'll ask it anyway. So looking at these 59,000 tonnes of ore that was stockpiled in this current quarter, and I think the production update also said that there will basically be more ore that will be added to the stockpile. Look, as I'm trying to wrap my head around it, I don't recall this kind of happening in the past. And yes, the additional kind of 1,500 tonnes per day additional capacity from the new production line would resolve those issues, presumably. But why did so much ore just not get processed? Just it seems kind of strange that this happened.
Actually, if you look back, we have seen some carryover and even in our Q4, which traditionally is our weakest quarter because of Chinese New Year, mining activity ceases because of the shutdown but it's easier to keep the mill running. And so we actually, even in this last Q4, we did play a bit of catch-up in Q4 to cover some of the inventories that were developed in Q3. So it's just more of the fact that as we're advancing and developing, we're looking at ramping up that mining activity and we are hitting up on those capacity limits at the mill. And so I think this is sort of evidence of why the expansion plan and why the mill expansion specifically is needed as part of delivering this growth in production that we're expecting to show in this life of mine plan that will come out in the report. I don't know if that helps, but...
So some of this ore that was stockpiled, if I understand correctly, some of it is kind of, I guess, let's just say, runoff from Q1? Is that kind of the right way to think about it?
Yes, yes. I mean, it's mine...
Q1 calendar '24 is what I mean. So Q4 fiscal?
No, no. No, no. This increase was generated in this quarter.
Okay, got you...
Yes. What I was referring to is the fact that even in the last Q4, we were able to mill more than we mined in Q4 because of what had been mined and stockpiled in, say, Q3. So I was saying that we have had the ability to play catch-up in Q4 because mining activity has been less than milling. And in this case, we've got mining activity greater than milling in Q1. So that's created that inventory stockpile that we're going to mill through by the end of this fiscal year.
Okay, that makes sense. One last question before I go. I think you mentioned the remaining kind of CapEx spend on the new tailings facility but I didn't quite catch it. What's the number that we should be looking at there?
Budget for this year is $13 million.
So that's the remaining?
Yes, that's the remaining for the year. This will include some of the $14 million that has been spent to date, as we account for the expenses incurred in this current quarter.
Your next question comes from Dalton Baretto from Canaccord.
Lon, I wanted to ask you about the permit at El Domo. The lower courts threw out the challenge. And I'm just wondering, do you guys think it will be appealed? And how are you planning your next steps based on that?
Well, I think the indications that were put out to the market were that the plaintiffs indicated at the end of the first lower court hearing that they intended to appeal, and so we fully expect that to take place. And that will move then from the local court to the provincial court. And we intend to respond to the case as Adventus and the team in Ecuador have been. And we feel positive about the outcome, just given what we've seen not just in terms of the outcome of the hearing, but in terms of the case, the way it was handled, the commitment from all parties on our side to defend against the allegations made by the plaintiffs. So from our standpoint, I guess the second part of your question is we don't intend to hold back from advancing the project, pending that appeal.
Are there any restrictions on you guys while this is still in the court system? Or can you move ahead as of...
Yes, we can move ahead.
Got it, okay. And then in the event that it gets all the way up to the Supreme Court, what sort of timeline are we talking here?
Well, to be specific, Supreme Court, in this case, if it makes it to the sort of the third level, which would be the constitutional court, that could be a matter of 2 to 3 years potentially. And in some cases, there's other cases in the country that have outstanding challenges that have been open for years and not addressed or resolved and the projects just went ahead.
So would you guys be willing to sort of put shovels on the ground while this is going on in the background?
Yes, I think that's what we're indicating in the sense that these development plans that we're going to come out with are going to speak to the activities we're looking to target initially to move forward and build the project.
Got it. And maybe one last one for me. How are you thinking about financing the actual build?
Well, the actual build based on the previous feasibility study and our work that we think we can make some improvements can be covered off based on the funding package from Wheaton as well as cash on hand.
Your next question comes from Kevin O'Halloran from BMO.
On the Ying optimizations and the technical report, will the other optimizations you're making, like the XRTs and the equipment upgrades, will those all be included in the updated life of mine plan? And then maybe if you could just give a quick comment on how those are tracking.
Yes, they will because we are assessing operating costs and cutoff grades based on various factors, including mining methods such as shrinkage stoping, as well as introducing two additional mining methods on a minor scale in terms of tonnage. We have been evaluating all these factors and their costs to determine reserve resources and develop the life of mine plan and economics. You will find all that in the report. I would say that everything is progressing well and according to plan. Moreover, some of the work we have been doing in developing these ramps has opened up new areas and identified zones that were previously unknown, providing additional benefits from this development plan and the shift in mining.
Okay, great. Yes, looking forward to seeing that come through in the report. Last one for me is, can you just remind us of the timeline that you're envisioning for Kuanping in terms of getting that into development and then how long until first production?
Well, that's going to be sort of a bootstrapping situation where we will break ground and develop and, obviously, looking at developing, how would I say, efficiently and finding a way to get into early ore even if that's development ore that we can bring to the mill. But looking to see ground broken and the mine starting to be built by the end of this fiscal year.
Okay, got you...
You should manage expectations regarding the initial tonnages, but we aim to break ground and have the mine operational by year-end or early in the new year.
Your next question comes from Felix Shafigullin from Eight Capital.
Just one question for me. I just wanted to double-check. The XRT sorters are operational already, right?
They are being implemented in phases. We have one that is currently in trial and has been installed at Mill No. 2, operating on a trial basis. The results from this consistent operation will guide the decision to add the other two units planned for the other mine site locations.
This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.
Great. Well, thanks, operator, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. If anyone has any further questions, please feel free to call or e-mail us, and we look forward to hearing from you. And look forward to following up with some of these exciting news items that we are going to be releasing here in the coming weeks. Have a great day.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect. Thank you.