管理層發言
Good morning, and good evening. First of all, thank you all for joining this conference call, and now we will begin the conference of the fiscal year 2026 2nd quarter earnings results by KEPCO. This conference will start with a presentation, followed by a divisional Q&A session. Operator instructions: Now we shall commence the presentation.
Good afternoon. This is Heung-Bok, Head of Finance at KEPCO. I'd like to thank you all for participating in today's conference call for the business results for the second quarter of 2026, despite your busy schedules. Today's call will be conducted in both Korean and English. We will begin with a brief presentation on the earnings results, which will be followed by a Q&A session. Please note that the financial information to be disclosed today is preliminary consolidated IFRS figures and all comparison is on a year-over-year basis unless stated otherwise. Also, business plans, targets, financial estimates and other forward-looking statements mentioned today are based on our current targets and forecasts. Please be noted that such statements may involve investment risks and uncertainties. Now we will begin with an overview of the earnings results for the first half of 2026 in Korean, which will be then consecutively translated into English. First, I will go over the operating performance. The consolidated operating income in 2026 1st half stood at KRW 4,912.7 billion. Revenue increased by 0.3% to KRW 46,317.3 billion. Power sales decreased by 0.4% to KRW 43,964.1 billion. Other revenue, including overseas business revenue, increased by 16.7% to KRW 2,353.2 billion. Cost of goods sold and SG&A rose by 2.8% to KRW 41,404.6 billion. Fuel costs increased by 8.8% to KRW 10,142.9 billion. Purchase power costs decreased by 0.9% to KRW 17,206.9 billion. Depreciation expense increased by 1.3% to KRW 5,951.5 billion. Of the nonoperating items, interest expense decreased by KRW 132.2 billion year-over-year to KRW 2,079.1 billion. As a result of the foregoing, the 2026 1st half consolidated operating income stood at KRW 4,912.7 billion and net income at KRW 2,796.5 billion.
Good afternoon. I'm Taeseop Eom, Senior IR Manager. I will now go over the main areas of interest, starting with power sales performance and outlook. 2026 1st half power sales volume decreased by 0.6% year-over-year to 266.7 terawatt hours due to a decrease in industrial demand caused by economic slowdown. For the full year, a higher economic growth rate and number of operating days are expected to slightly increase sales volume. Next, I will go over fuel price by fuel source and SMP trends. In 2026 1st half for bituminous coal, Australian coal was around $128.2 per ton. JKM LNG was about KRW 939,000 per ton. SMP was approximately KRW 112.3 per kilowatt hour. Looking at the subsidiaries' generation mix in the first half, the capacity factor of nuclear power decreased and contribution to the generation mix declined. For coal, utilization and contribution to the generation mix both increased due to the decrease of the capacity factor of nuclear power. In the case of LNG, contribution to the generation mix increased as the overall volume of baseload generation decreased. In 2026, the contribution of nuclear power should slightly increase, coal should slightly decrease and LNG should largely be maintained. Also in 2026, the capacity factor of these power sources is projected to be low- to mid-80% for nuclear power, low- to mid-50% for coal and low- to mid-20% for LNG. RPS cost as of 2026 1st half was KRW 2,533 billion on a consolidated basis and KRW 2,938.9 billion on a stand-alone basis. Lastly, on funding: as of 2026 1st half, total borrowings on a consolidated basis were KRW 133.3 trillion and KRW 84.8 trillion on a stand-alone basis. Now we will move on to the Q&A session. Since we will be conducting the Q&A session in Korean and English, with consecutive interpretation, please make your questions and answers clear and brief.
分析師問答
The first question will be given by Sung Jong Hwa from LS Securities.
I have one question on the contribution of nuclear power to the generation mix. Since Q3 last year, we have seen the contribution of nuclear power to the generation mix decline quite significantly on a year-over-year basis. And this Q2, I think we also saw a decline. That means this trend has been continuing for four consecutive quarters. But in your keynote today, you mentioned that for the full year, the contribution of nuclear power should show a slight increase. But as I just mentioned, in the first half of this year, already, we have seen significant decline on a year-over-year basis. And when we listened to the earnings call of your subsidiary, they mentioned that the preventive maintenance can be prolonged. So given all of these factors, does this mean in the second half, we will see a significant increase in the nuclear power contribution on a year-over-year basis to make sure that on a full year basis, nuclear power generation contribution still increased slightly, like you mentioned in your keynote? Or for this year, will you be managing these numbers more tightly?
Thank you for the question. As mentioned in the keynote, the capacity factor of nuclear power is expected to be around early to mid-80% according to KEPCO. Like you've mentioned, there has been some issues with prolonged preventive maintenance of some nuclear generation units. As a result of that, in the first half, the capacity factor numbers were quite weak. However, we are monitoring the situation in the second half very closely. We are adding Saeul Unit 3 to the grid. And we are planning to implement preventive maintenance in existing nuclear power plants in a more timely manner to make sure that we can maintain an appropriate level of nuclear power generation contribution for the full year.
The following question is from an analyst at UBS.
First one is regarding cost. So if we look at the numbers of the first half and try to estimate Q2 numbers based on the first half results, there seems to be an increase in fuel cost, but more visibly an increase in other operating costs. So what would be the factors that drove the other operating cost on a year-over-year basis in Q2? My second question is regarding the tariffs. So I understand that the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Environment is preparing to announce a corporate differentiated tariff system. And so what would be the financial impact if this new differentiated charging system is introduced?
Yes. I will take your first question regarding the nonoperating cost drivers. We already talked about KHNP and that the preventive maintenance period has been prolonged, so this has generated around KRW 101.3 billion in other operating expense. Another factor is coming from Korea Southeastern Power. They supply fuel or coal to private operators, and there was an increase of KRW 70.3 billion in terms of the material cost associated with the supply of coal to private operators. Regarding your second question on the differentiated electricity pricing system, I think you are referring to regional differentiation of electricity pricing. Unfortunately, it is too early to disclose any detailed financial impact. Just to give you a little more color on timing and progress: there should be a public hearing on regional pricing differentiation during the second half, and towards the latter half of the year, I believe this system will be finalized. It will be introduced by the end of this year, and it will be in conjunction with the reform of the regional wholesale power pricing mechanism.
The following question is by Pierre Lau from Citibank.
I have three questions on KEPCO. The first one is, given that we have lower global oil prices as the Middle East conflict seems to have more stability now, do KEPCO expect its fuel cost in third quarter to be lower than that in second quarter or should it be similar? Second question is, what is KEPCO's expectation regarding tariff rise? Could we expect any tariff rise for the rest of this year? Or do we have to wait until 2027? The third question is: does KEPCO think it's able to lower the ratio of corporate bond issuance to the sum of capital and reserves to below 2x by end of 2027?
I'll take your first question on the fuel costs. If we look at the SMP in Q2 of 2026 and compare that on a year-over-year basis, it's lower than last year Q2. But if we look at the July and August numbers, SMP in July 2025 was 121, and this year it has been around 133. SMP in August 2025 was around 117 for the full month; this year to date it's around 151. There can be many different factors that caused the SMP to increase on a year-over-year basis, but one of the main drivers will be the increase of international fuel costs. There is a time lag between the actual increase in the market and when it is reflected in the SMP. I think this time lag has started to kick in during July and August. Yes, in terms of tariff hikes: in order to address the accumulated operating loss and to also meet the bond issuance requirements, an increase in tariff will be very helpful. At the same time, there are various factors that need to be considered when raising the tariffs such as inflation and the overall macroeconomic situation. We will be monitoring the domestic and international markets and economies very closely, and we'll be discussing with the government to try to achieve a tariff hike in the future.
And then regarding your last question on the bond issuance cap: I don't believe it's an issue of whether we can meet this 2x requirement by end of 2027. We will make utmost effort to ensure that we can meet those requirements by 2027 year-end. We are not really focusing on reducing the overall bond issuance amount. Rather, we are working more on increasing profit generation from operating activities. As just mentioned when answering the second question, we will work closely with the government to achieve an appropriate level of tariffs to make sure that we can meet these requirements by the end of 2027.
The following question is by Yoo Jaeseon from Hana Securities.
In the first half last year, KHNP's other provisional liabilities were KRW 471.3 billion. What would be this number for the first half of this year?
The number for this half, from January to June, was KRW 307.8 billion, but there have been some write-backs. So it's actually a negative cost of KRW 164.2 billion.
Currently, there are no participants with questions. The following question is by Sung Jong Hwa from LS Securities.
I have one question on the three mega projects announced by the government. I believe there is a critical role to play by KEPCO as the central power provider. But in order to do so, you will have to significantly increase capacity and also expand the power grid, which will require considerable amounts of CapEx. We just discussed the bond issuance cap, reducing it from 5x to 2x. You said that to meet these requirements, you will be working to boost profit generation at KEPCO. However, even considering all of these factors, given the sheer amount of capital required for such large national projects, KEPCO will need additional capital and funding. What is your solution in terms of funding such large national projects?
Thank you for the question. The mega projects and the grid expansion that you mentioned are mid- to long-term projects, meaning that it does not necessarily mean we need the full amount upfront at once. At the same time, we do face the challenge of reducing the bond issuance amount to 2x of capital. So I think we need to take a balanced approach. We need to develop a mid- to long-term CapEx plan and calculate the total CapEx amount that may be necessary for these projects and try to distribute that across multiple quarters and years. We will also have a strict management approach towards the management of funds that we already have. We will be working closely with government departments, multiple stakeholders and all relevant departments and subsidiaries of KEPCO to come up with the most optimal way to approach these funding needs. At the same time, of course, we will also work to ensure that such CapEx does not undermine the overall business management of KEPCO.
Currently, there are no participants with questions.
Yes. I would like to take this opportunity to make a correction in the keynote presentation today regarding the contribution of the different fuel sources to the generation mix. We mentioned earlier that coal contribution increased. The main factors were the increase in LNG prices triggered by the Middle East conflict and also higher bituminous coal prices as well. So I don't think that was very clearly stated in the presentation earlier, so I would like to make this correction. Thank you.
As there are no further questions, we will now end the Q&A session. For any additional inquiries, please contact our IR department. This concludes the fiscal year 2026 2nd quarter earnings results by KEPCO. Thank you for your participation. (Portions of this transcript that are marked as interpreted were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.)