管理層發言
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the DigitalOcean Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. I will now hand the conference over to Radu Patrichi, Head of Investor Relations. Radu, please go ahead.
Thank you, and good morning. Thank you all for joining us today to review DigitalOcean's Second Quarter 2026 Results. Joining me on the call today are Paddy Srinivasan, our Chief Executive Officer; and Matt Steinfort, our Chief Financial Officer. For those of you following along, an accompanying slide presentation is available on the webcast. Before we begin, let me remind you that certain statements made on today's call may be considered forward-looking, which reflect management's best judgment based on currently available information. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements, including our financial outlook. I direct your attention to the risk factors contained in our SEC filings as well as those referenced in today's press release that is posted on our website. DigitalOcean expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements made today. Additionally, non-GAAP financial measures will be discussed on this conference call. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in today's earnings press release as well as in our investor presentation that outlines the discussion on today's call. A webcast of today's call is available in the IR section of our website. And with that, I turn the call over to Patti.
Thank you, Radu. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. We had an exceptional Q2 as we continue to accelerate growth in a disciplined way, and I'm excited to share the highlights with all of you. Let me start with 4 key takeaways from the quarter. First, our growth rate continues to accelerate. As we previewed several weeks ago, Q2 was another strong quarter for DigitalOcean. We were above guidance on every key metric. We delivered 29% year-over-year revenue growth while continuing to have strong profitability. Second, our inference services, the collection of all non-bare metal inferencing capabilities on our AI native cloud is getting tremendous traction and grew almost 800% year-over-year. Launched in late April this year, our inference engine, which is a managed offering that includes serverless inference and related technologies, is off to a flying start with over 6,000 customers, including material inference workloads from some of the most sophisticated AI native companies. Third, an AI-native flywheel is emerging, driving adoption across our full AI native cloud with a new entry point through our inference engine. We are already seeing early signs of this flywheel. More than half of new AI customers added year-to-date have core cloud attached. We believe this flywheel will drive higher margin and stickier services, further increasing our ARR per megawatt and differentiating us from bare metal Neoclouds. And finally, we continue to focus on disciplined execution and durable growth. While we continue to manage the same supply chain challenges that face the entire industry, we are delivering our new 2026 capacity on time and in some cases, ahead of schedule. We secured an incremental 20 megawatts. We strengthened our balance sheet. We landed our first 9-figure annual revenue commitments, and we remain focused on responsible investment and generating attractive returns. With our meaningful progress and momentum, we are again raising our full year 2026 outlook. We now expect revenue growth of approximately 30% for the full year 2026 and to reach at least 35% growth by Q4 of 2026. While it is premature to give formal guidance for 2027, we are even more confident in our prior 2027 estimate of 50% plus revenue growth for the full year 2027. I'll now spend a few minutes drilling into each of these 4 key takeaways. First, we delivered record Q2 revenue performance and the top line continues to accelerate with demand well in excess of capacity. Q2 revenue was $281 million, up approximately 29% year-over-year, which is more than double our growth rate in the same period last year. We delivered a record $93 million in incremental ARR in Q2, the most incremental ARR in a quarter in the company's history and nearly triple what we added in the same quarter last year. And we are doing all of this with strong profitability. We delivered 40% adjusted EBITDA margin, 24% adjusted operating income margin and 17% trailing 12-month adjusted free cash flow margin in the quarter. We are driving this growth by continuing to deliver for our highest spending customers. ARR from $100,000-plus customers grew 98% year-over-year and our $500,000-plus customer ARR grew 160% and our $1 million-plus customer ARR rose 214%. The higher spend the cohort has, the faster that cohort is growing, and this has been the case for 8 quarters in a row. Our highest spending cohort is also becoming a much bigger portion of our business, and a critical part of our growth engine, growing from 9% of total ARR a year ago to 23% in Q2. AI customer ARR reached $234 million, growing over 200% year-over-year. AI customers come to DigitalOcean for more than just capacity. They come to us for software and the capabilities that help them accelerate their business. 85% of AI customer ARR in the quarter came from inference services and core cloud, not from bare metal. Inference services are the fastest-growing component of our AI customer ARR, growing close to 800% year-over-year and now represent over 70% of our total AI customer ARR. We are a full stack cloud platform with software that AI native companies depend on to build, run and scale production AI. The second key takeaway is the growing traction of our inference engine. We launched our inference engine, which provides the right model at the right performance and price for every task as a part of our AI native cloud in late April. Since then, over 6,000 customers have leveraged the inference engine, while customer count grew an average of close to 60% month-over-month, and the token volume increased 30x over the last 60 days. We have seen open weight models climb up from around 15% of total token volume following our April launch to close to 75% today, highlighting the importance of open weight models in the AI native ecosystem. This token growth is driven by strong demand from AI natives, not from individual users looking for a batch for the most token consumption. Tokenmaxxing was the industry's first instinct: maximize usage, throw the largest frontier model at everything and let the bill compound. As workloads shifted from human prompted to agent-driven, token consumption and cost exploded. For an AI-native company, tokens are both a source of value and COGS. So runaway costs are an existential threat to their unit economics. We believe that the market is shifting towards valuemaxxing, the right model at the right cost for every task, measured in business outcomes per dollar. This shift is a tailwind for us as we believe that value creation opportunities will expand from just whoever built the model to include whoever serves it the best. Open weight models make valuemaxxing possible. Open weights let customers post-train on their own data and control their cost curve. Frontier-quality open weight models at compelling cost-performance characteristics have been a key adoption driver. For analyst evaluations, today's best open models trail the frontier models by only a few percentage points and are over 70% of token volume per OpenRouter, the largest and most popular AI gateway. An open weight file is necessary but not sufficient for companies to own their intelligence. Turning open weights into fast, reliable, economical production tokens is a systems problem our inference engine solves. Continuous batching, quantization, KV cache optimization, speculative decoding, prompt caching, intelligent routing and workload-aware scheduling, all engineered as one system on infrastructure we own. Like traditional open source software, the model may be free, but making it useful and serving it well is the product. Our inference engine is much more than an API endpoint to an open weight model. It has become a full production runtime solving today's most pressing needs. Our inference router optimizes requests in real time for quality, latency and cost across our full open and frontier catalog behind one unified API. Close to 1,400 inference customers actively use this feature to optimize dollars per unit of intelligence. Model Synthesis, a new feature we just released, orchestrates a panel of models in parallel with the synthesizer merging their outputs, delivering frontier-grade quality at a fraction of frontier cost. Model evaluations let customers test any model against their own business data. Batch inference handles high-volume asynchronous workloads. Prompt caching cuts cost and latency with zero application changes. Server-side tools give agents web search, retrieval and function calling natively inside inference requests with built-in access to knowledge bases and MCP servers. Together, these features turn model choice from a onetime decision into a dynamic ongoing engineering and business decision. On our platform, open weight models grew from roughly 15% of tokens following our initial launch to close to 75% today. And when Kimi K3, the largest open weight model ever released, went live on July 27, we were the only full stack cloud provider to be a launch partner, delivering day 0 access. Adoption has been incredible with over 400 net new customers just in the first week. Our model catalog now offers 75-plus open and closed source models through a single endpoint, including GLM-5.2, DeepSeek V4, GPT-5.6, OPUS 5, et cetera, with 14 day 0 launches since April of this year. Our third key takeaway is that our AI native cloud is becoming a flywheel. Every layer a customer adopts pulls them into the next. In late April, we launched the DigitalOcean AI native cloud, 5 fully integrated layers from silicon to inference to agents with open source support at every layer. Since then, we shipped more than 80 releases across all layers, demonstrating innovation across the platform. These releases included managed agent products like server-side tools, data and learning products like knowledge bases, the inference engine I just discussed and cloud primitives like our new insights observability service. An integrated full stack platform is foundational to AI builders because AI native applications require far more than raw GPUs or just tokens. They need a production cloud designed around inference and agentic execution. Building and operating that cloud is hard. It requires deep engineering across data centers, silicon, networking, storage, Kubernetes, databases, model serving, routing, evaluations, agent runtimes and much, much more. Our integrated platform eliminates this complexity for customers and a flywheel is emerging as these AI builders adopt it. Customers enter the platform through one of the 3 front doors, inference, agents or core compute. Most AI native customers first need inference with the right model at the right performance and the right price for every task. From there, inference graduates into agentic workflows, which use and generate data that requires databases, storage, knowledge bases and observability. That generated data becomes raw material for learning, improving and customizing the models. Agent runtimes and learning drive demand for compute. And because that compute runs on infrastructure we own and operate every turn of the wheel improves our unit economics, better price performance for customers, spurs even more tokens and the cycle accelerates. Adoption in each layer drives the next and the effects compound. Inference is one entry point into a self-reinforcing cycle that pulls customers deeper into the platform and has been a leading indicator for full platform adoption. And this flywheel is already working. Let me give you some examples. OpenCode, a leading open source AI coding agent with over 7.5 million monthly active developers started by integrating with DigitalOcean Droplets to simplify agent development. Now OpenCode is also using DigitalOcean's inference engine and AI native cloud for its inference needs, including access to leading open weight models. In addition to OpenCode, we have also integrated DigitalOcean AI native cloud into other leading coding and agent building environments like OpenClaw, Codex, Hermes and Grok Build. When developers build there, our inference engine is already in their workflows just one API call away. That opens the inference front door at ecosystem scale. Daytona, an advanced AI sandbox company, builds secure elastic sandboxes for AI-generated code and autonomous agents on DigitalOcean. This is a textbook full stack agentic workload running on our platform. Its workloads require GPU acceleration, isolated compute environments, fast deployment, storage, networking and orchestration all working together. Vercel, a scaled agentic infrastructure platform is integrating DigitalOcean inference engine into their AI gateway to provide their customers with dedicated AI platform capabilities. Another great example of this is OpenRouter, which is both an efficient customer acquisition channel and a platform through which we can dial up or down on-demand traffic to test, learn and scale as we launch new models. We now serve more than 20 billion tokens per day on OpenRouter, up more than 330% over the last 60 days with much of that traffic being generated from agents. These customers are examples of AI builders spinning our flywheel, and the flywheel does not stop at the first entry point. Every turn adds products to the stack we own, an integrated platform running on our own infrastructure spanning 20 global data centers. Owning the stack lowers our cost to serve, and that lower cost structure, combined with the emergence of high-quality, low-cost open weight models gives us better unit economics to serve our customers, which in turn enables us to win more customers. For AI native, that advantage enables precisely what they value, better cost and performance on every workload, faster time to market, tight integration across inference, agents, data and compute and freedom from having to stitch together a myriad of services across vendors. This is clearly resonating with our customers as roughly 70% of AI customers having $100,000 or more ARR in Q2 have attached a core cloud product to their AI workloads, showing early evidence of this flywheel in action. This value proposition is very differentiated in the market. Hyperscalers optimize for frontier labs and large enterprises. Neoclouds have built strong GPU rental businesses for model training and are adding software mostly through acquisitions. Assembling capabilities is not the same as building an integrated platform and customers often bear that complexity. Inference providers serve tokens well, but rent their GPUs with margins stacked on margins and leaving customers to stitch together inference, agents, data and compute. Our approach is different. One, purpose-built AI native cloud tightly integrated from the ground up, enabling AI native to start and scale their agentic applications on our cloud. We will dive deeper into our AI native cloud at our AI Builder Summit on October 13 in San Francisco and we hope to see you all there, which brings me to our fourth and final takeaway that we remain disciplined in our execution and continue to focus on durable growth. This discipline is evident not only in our financial performance, but also in our operational execution and in our responsible and profitable approach to growth. Driving growth approaching 30% in Q2 on a path to 50% plus next year requires focused execution. We remain on time and even a little bit ahead of our previously communicated schedule on all 3 of our new 2026 data centers. We launched our Richmond data center in Q1, our Kansas City data center in Q2, both ahead of target, and we remain on track for the second half launch of our Memphis data center. Beyond just hitting our launch date, we've been able to allocate the majority of the capacity to specific customers or to our highly in-demand token fleet before we launch these data centers. We also secured approximately 20 megawatts of additional capacity this quarter, which is targeted to come online over the last part of 2027 and into 2028. This brings total committed capacity to approximately 155 megawatts, the majority of which will be online by the end of 2027. We continue to actively pursue additional capacity to drive further growth and meet customer demand. Our discipline is also evident in the steps we took to strengthen our balance sheet. In July, we reduced our leverage with minimal dilution and use of cash by retiring approximately $472 million of our 2030 convertible notes, creating additional capacity to cost effectively finance our future investments. It is worth pausing on how different our profile is from many others in the AI infrastructure market. Number one, our growth is driven by a broad set of AI native companies rather than by a handful of large bare metal offtake contracts with our top 25 customers representing only 20% of ARR in Q2. Next, our largely consumption-based model gives us the flexibility to adapt to market conditions and shift capacity to where it is most valuable. This flexibility enabled us to increase list prices on numerous GPU fleets recently by approximately 30%. Third, we are profitable with 40% adjusted EBITDA margins, 24% operating income margin and 17% last 12 months adjusted free cash flow margin. And finally, we closely match our cash outflow with our revenue by financing equipment, efficiently funding our growth. There are very few companies with our combination of positive adjusted operating margins and projected growth of 50% plus. This is a generational opportunity, and we will go after it responsibly, building a durable business on the foundation of our differentiated software and full stack AI native cloud platform. With this momentum continuing to build, we are again raising our 2026 outlook. For the full year 2026, we now expect revenue growth of approximately 30% with an exit growth rate of 35% or more by Q4. That trajectory and the incremental committed capacity we've added both clearly strengthen our conviction in 50% or more revenue growth in 2027. With that, I will turn it over to Matt.
Thanks, Paddy. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining. As Paddy shared, Q2 was an outstanding quarter. I'm excited to take you through the results, provide further context on some of the actions we have taken and provide some additional color on our updated outlook. Q2 revenue was $281 million, up 29% year-over-year, above the high end of guidance. The outperformance was broad-based, led by growth from our highest spending customers and our expanding AI customer base. Our highest spending customers didn't just keep growing, they accelerated. ARR from our 100,000-plus customers grew 98%, up from 37% in the second quarter of last year. Our 500,000-plus customer ARR grew 160%, up from 64%. And our $1 million-plus customer ARR grew 214%, up from 92%. Each of these highest spending customer cohorts is now growing more than twice as fast as it was a year ago. We continue to gain meaningful traction with some of the most sophisticated AI natives. AI customer ARR reached $234 million, growing 212%. And critically, 85% of that ARR is non-bare metal. This traction is evident in the material commitments we secured during the quarter, which collectively increased remaining performance obligations to $894 million, up more than 12x year-over-year with a 3.7-year average life. While changes to RPO will be lumpy, these commitments add visibility, and we expect to secure more of them in the future. They have not, however, come at the expense of our broad customer diversification as our top 25 customers represented only 20% of ARR in Q2, and this will only modestly increase as these deals ramp up. One quick note on key financial metrics. Our business has changed dramatically over the last 2 years, with growth increasingly driven by our top customers and by emerging AI customers. Against that backdrop, net dollar retention, a strong indicator in the slow and steady growth SaaS world, has become a less useful measure of our performance. While our 102% NDR in Q2 is a 3-year high, we'll no longer highlight it as a key financial metric. Growth today is shaped far more by our highest spending and AI customers than by the NDR trend across our 680,000-plus customer base. Profitability remained strong in Q2. Adjusted EBITDA was $114 million, and adjusted EBITDA margin of 40%. GAAP operating income was $29 million, a 10% margin, and adjusted operating income was $67 million, a 24% margin. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.45. Adjusted free cash flow in the quarter was $61 million. Trailing 12-month adjusted free cash flow was $175 million or 17% of revenue. As Paddy highlighted, we proactively strengthened our balance sheet, reducing our leverage with effectively no dilution and minimal use of cash. In July, we equitized $472 million of our 0% 2030 convertible senior notes. The underlying shares were both already reflected in our diluted share count and were highly likely to be converted given where our stock is trading. And yet the full principal value was also reflected in our net debt, reducing our leverage capacity. Through this proactive transaction, we retired more than half of our convertible debt 4 years ahead of maturity, reduced net leverage and did so with effectively no dilution and minimal use of cash, freeing up capacity to invest in further growth. Turning to guidance. We are raising our 2026 revenue outlook. For the third quarter of 2026, we expect revenue of $304 million to $307 million, representing 32% to 34% year-over-year growth. We project adjusted EBITDA margins of 38% to 39% and non-GAAP diluted net income per share of $0.28 to $0.30 on approximately 126.5 million weighted average fully diluted shares. For the full year 2026, we expect revenue of $1.17 billion to $1.18 billion, representing approximately 30.5% year-over-year growth with an exit growth rate of 35% or more in Q4. We expect adjusted EBITDA margins of approximately 39%, non-GAAP diluted EPS of $1.35 to $1.40 and adjusted free cash flow margin of 11% to 13%, an increase to our prior guide. While it's premature to speak to 2027 guidance, the positive momentum we're generating and the higher projected exit growth rate give us even more confidence in our estimated 50% plus growth for the full year 2027. Before I turn it back to Paddy, let me put our progress in perspective. Revenue grew 14% year-over-year in the second quarter of last year. In a single year, we have doubled our growth rate to 29%. We are now projecting to nearly double it again on an annual basis next year. And we are delivering this growth with attractive margins, appropriate leverage, a strong and flexible balance sheet and disciplined execution. With that, I'll hand it back to Paddy.
Thank you, Matt. Before we move to Q&A, let me recap what we shared today. First, growth continues to accelerate, approximately 29% revenue growth, more than double the growth from a year ago, record $93 million in incremental ARR, AI customers and $1 million-plus customers each growing ARR more than 200%. We delivered this growth with strong profitability and free cash flow. Second, our inference services are getting tremendous traction. Inference services grew nearly 800% year-over-year. Token usage on our inference engine is compounding monthly and open weight models have climbed from 15% of token traffic to close to 75%. Open weight model adoption leverages our strength, turning open models into fast, reliable, economical production tokens. Third, adoption of our inference engine is creating a growth flywheel. Inference is the entry point and every layer a customer adopts improves their token price performance and pulls them deeper into the platform. Leading AI builders like OpenCode, Vercel and Daytona began spinning that flywheel. And because the entire cycle runs on infrastructure we own, it drives customers to higher margin and stickier products, increasing our potential ARR per megawatt. Finally, we remain disciplined in our execution, deploying planned capacity on or ahead of schedule, securing 20 megawatts of incremental capacity, delivering strong margins and strengthening the balance sheet. Our momentum and solid execution enables us to raise our 2026 outlook and positions us for strong performance in 2027. Before I end my comments, let me connect these 4 key takeaways because the connection is the real story. Software makes megawatts more valuable. Our software attracts high-quality AI native customers with insatiable demand. Those customers adopt more of the platform than just capacity and that broader adoption increases what each megawatt earns, driving durable growth, higher margins and cash flow in future years. Strategy is becoming results and results are building momentum. Platform shifts like this come along once in a generation. Quarters like this one show that we are becoming both an enabler and a beneficiary of that shift. With that, let's open it up for questions.
分析師問答
Your first question comes from the line of Gabriela Borges with Goldman Sachs.
I wanted to ask a little bit about DigitalOcean's ability to scale. Paddy, to your point, the hyperscalers are optimized for large enterprises. DigitalOcean has historically been optimized for smaller customers, but you're actually landing these larger flagship customers that have larger commitments, have larger backlog deals and require perhaps a different type of sales process, a different type of operational process. So twofold question for you. How are you meeting those demands of the larger scaled customers? And then I think just maybe partly for Matt, how are you thinking as you scale these larger chunks of megawatts, talk to us about some of the operational puts and takes to being able to get those megawatts online at the right time and up and running.
Thank you, Gabriela. It's a great question. We feel very confident in our ability to scale, given our track record. We have been doing this at a global scale, running a cloud business and managing a global network of data centers for the last dozen-plus years with hyperscaler SLAs and serving over 0.5 million paying customers along the way. So we feel very confident in our ability, and we are demonstrating that by bringing capacity on time and also before schedule. I always work backwards from the customers we are targeting and what they are coming to us for. Right now, they are coming to us not just for capacity, as I mentioned. So they are not expecting some exotic bespoke hardware or network configuration. They're predominantly coming to us because of the richness of our AI native cloud. From a platform innovation perspective, our pace of innovation, as I described, is just staggering with over a major release every business day and sometimes multiple. Our engineering talent is world-class, and we aggressively keep adding to it. To augment that engineering talent, we have also stood up a forward deployed engineering organization to work with some of our larger, more sophisticated customers with demanding workloads to ensure that they're getting the right price-performance-throughput-accuracy combination. But most of our core software doesn't have to be heavily customized to meet their needs. From a go-to-market point of view, we just added Kevin Van Gundy as our Chief Revenue Officer, who comes with tremendous experience working in the digital and AI native ecosystem. We added Leo as our Chief Marketing Officer, who brings a wealth of marketing experience from Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud. They're in the process of scaling up our go-to-market muscle to help us address the next phase of our hyper growth. But this is something we feel very confident about. We've been doing this for a number of years. And I'll let Matt answer the infrastructure question. From a talent density perspective, both on core engineering and go-to-market, I feel really good. We have demonstrated this in the recent past, and that's why we keep talking about our $500,000 and $1 million customers and how that flywheel is spinning and has been doing it for about 8 quarters in a row now.
Yes, and I would just add to that, Gabriela, that the customers that we're dealing with, while they're bigger, these aren't your traditional brick-and-mortar enterprise companies. These are very, very sophisticated technical customers where their founders and leaders are often deeply technical. They very much appreciate the depth and breadth of the engineering talent that we have and our ability to work with them, which I think uniquely positions us to be able to meet their needs. From an infrastructure standpoint, as you've seen, we're working with some of the top data center operators in the industry that are very experienced bringing up capacity. We've got a deep and talented team that works alongside of them. We have great partnerships with the leading chip manufacturers. We've got a great supply chain with a diversified set of OEMs that are all global. And we've been able to manage the implementation schedules and turn up capacity despite some of the challenges that everyone faces in the industry. We've been able to do that on time and meet the requirements that these large customers have put in front of us. We're very encouraged by the partnership we have with those customers. We're doing a lot of joint development already. So I think it's more than just turning up infrastructure. It's having engineers working side by side with these very sophisticated and talented customers, and we're bringing really strong talent to bear, and we're very encouraged by the progress we're making.
Your next question comes from the line of Jason Ader with William Blair.
Two questions. First, just if you could provide any specifics on the impact of pricing on the revenue growth in Q2 and then for the updated outlook? That's the first question. The second question on equipment financing, Matt, for 2026, where do you expect net leverage to be at year-end? And could you provide any specific guidance on the free cash flow for the year, including all the leases?
Yes, Jason, good questions. On the pricing, we've — as you saw, we increased our list price on a number of GPU generations by about 30% a while ago. A lot of that pricing, we had already been upgrading given the short contract duration for some of our customers; we had already been increasing their prices upon renewal or, in some cases, pulling capacity back from a customer that we thought we had a better use for either in our token factory or with a different customer that was willing to pay a higher price. So all of that pricing is included in the '26 guide, and it's part of how we went from saying we're going to exit the year around 30% to now exiting it at around 35%. And it's a good setup for us in 2027 as well. On the equipment financing side, we continue to get access to very attractive rates and have ample capacity to fund the growth over the committed capacity that we've taken down. If you look at the pro forma net leverage, just take the Q2 balance sheet and simply subtract the amount of debt we retired in the equitization, it puts us at 0.7x net leverage. We're in a very good position to stay well below that 4x net leverage guideline that we had articulated. In fact, it should be well below that. And that's part of why we did that. We're now sitting with an incredibly strong and flexible balance sheet. We have the ability to take on incremental equipment financing and equipment-related borrowing capacity and fuel our growth. So it was a great step for us, and our leverage is going to be very comfortably below that guideline that we had provided.
And just on the free cash flow.
Free cash flow — yes, great question. Free cash flow, as we said, would be 11% to 13% for the year. That's on an adjusted free cash flow basis, which is higher than what we had guided previously. And if you take all of the principal payments and everything, we'll still generate cash in 2026. So we expect to be free cash flow positive on any metric that you use, whether it's adjusted free cash flow or taking complete cash generation and excluding principal payments. We will continue to generate cash in '26.
Your next question comes from the line of Mark Zhang with Citi.
So I wanted to actually dig in a little bit more into the 9-figure deals that you guys were able to sign this quarter. Number one, I wanted to get a sense of the impact: are these deals around inferencing and core cloud — are those logos committed for those services? And sort of what's the adoption of the other aspects of the 5-layer stack and what the monetization roadmap looks like going forward? Because I think the go-to-market philosophy here is really looking for large deals that can make good sense and continue to expand going forward. So I just want to get a sense of the opportunities from here as we go forward with the AI stack.
Thank you, Mark. So in terms of the larger deals, pretty much any deal that we are talking about these days typically involves multiple aspects of the platform. Over 70% of AI customers that we added this year at any significant scale are already using some aspects of the core cloud. Some layers of our AI native cloud are still new, and that's why we have another version of our AI Builders Conference scheduled on October 13 to talk a little bit more about the managed agents layer of our platform. If you take a step back and think about these workloads landing on our platform, they typically land on one of the 3 front doors that I talked about, and the front door is very important because that's the dominant use case for which these sophisticated workloads are coming to us. Immediately, they attach some part of our other layers of the cloud, whether it is databases or storage or orchestration. In many cases, it's a combination of all of the above and gives us more confidence that they're coming to us not just for tokens or capacity, but appreciating the value of the full platform because these workloads are building agentic applications from the ground up. By the nature of these agentic applications, they need far more than just GPUs or tokens. They need a place to do post-training. They need a place to store memory and context. They need secure sandboxes to run agents. They need ways to orchestrate these agents. So we feel increasingly confident, and that's why I spent time talking about the flywheel: the more AI-native workloads consume aspects of our platform, the more durable the revenue and the greater the chance these workloads scale on our platform. The early results are very encouraging given the attach we are seeing on the platform.
Got it. That's very helpful. And then maybe just a quick follow-up. You also mentioned that with the new CRO, Kevin coming in, you guys are certainly in the process of scaling up the go-to-market muscles. Can you just maybe give a sense of what the early preview of Kevin's plans are for the go-to-market organization? Should we expect more investments into sales and marketing and go-to-market for the enterprise level going forward from here?
Thanks, Mark. The primary focus right now is to land very high-quality AI-native workloads, the kinds we discussed on the call, which are top-tier AI native companies. In the last 90 days for our inference engine, we've added over 6,000 customers, which reflects an incredible product-led growth motion. We're tapping into the ecosystem at scale — OpenRouter, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent — getting customers from a variety of ecosystem hooks. In terms of human-based sales, yes, we will fortify our enterprise AI-native go-to-market motion. But right now, it is about nailing that motion with forward deployed engineering and enterprise sales reps that can qualify opportunities and hold their own with very technical founding teams. We will scale eventually, but right now it's about quality of engagements and getting the right engineering-oriented technical sales to attract and expand these AI native workloads. So I don't expect a broad ramp in spending immediately. It's focused investment to get the motion right before large-scale expansion.
Your next question comes from the line of Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America.
I appreciate the comment that it's still a bit premature for 2027. But if we look at your performance here, which has been really strong — RPO, the timing and on time or even earlier ramp of your data centers, your comments on token usage, higher exit rate for 2026 — put all of these together, should we not assume directionally that there is further upside to 2027 than what you thought 90 days ago? Any color there would be helpful. And I have a follow-up.
Yes, Wamsi, I think that's the appropriate conclusion. The challenge for us is revenue growth is very dependent on the timing of data center implementations and the turn on of capacity. We're in August and there's still a fair bit of moving parts in terms of dates and timings for next year. So we felt it's premature to give a specific number. But clearly, the message is we're exiting the year at a much faster growth rate than we had said previously. We've got significant RPO and we're landing larger customers. So we're very bullish and we expect there to be additional upside. It's just too early to put a precise number on it. We'll wait until later this year before providing specifics. But all indications are better than our position 90 days ago.
Okay. And then maybe, Paddy, just on the open weight models, you quoted that it's risen from roughly 15% to now nearly 75% of token volume since launch. How much of that usage is recurring production traffic versus maybe some batch inference where you have some discounts? I think you mentioned it was not batch, but I just want to make sure of that. And is the core cloud services attach any different between customers using closed versus open models?
Thanks, Wamsi. There isn't any major difference in what these workloads attach to based on whether they are open weight or closed models; they attach the same core cloud services. One pattern we observe is that most sophisticated production workloads are a combination of open weight and closed models. That's why we released Model Synthesis, which orchestrates running the same query in parallel across multiple models and synthesizing the results so customers don't have to stitch together the infrastructure plumbing themselves. Regarding production versus batch, absolutely yes — much of the traffic is production workload traffic. You can tell from throughput, latency and accuracy demands. Open weight models picking up traffic is not only about cost; some of the very large models are not cheap to serve. But as open weight models reach reasonable cost-performance, adoption accelerates dramatically and demand far exceeds our supply. I feel very good about these production workloads across coding, generative media and business workflows — they are production traffic that is scaling with insatiable demand.
Your next question comes from the line of Sanjit Singh with Morgan Stanley.
I wanted to revisit the revenue per megawatt story at DigitalOcean. You guys have obviously been at a huge premium to the Neoclouds. The bare metal mix is obviously coming down. You guys previously said that as the AI mix starts to increase, the revenue per megawatt will come down a bit from its current levels. Is that still the right thinking given we have the inference engine and success with attaching to the cloud portfolio? What are some of the levers to drive support for revenue per megawatt over time?
That's a great question. We expect the incremental ARR we get per megawatt to increase over time. Previously, as a general purpose cloud we generated north of $22 million in ARR per megawatt with limited AI. As we add incremental megawatts, we're adding more ARR per megawatt than many Neocloud peers because we offer higher layer services beyond bare metal, we sell to a broader customer base rather than a single large offtaker, and AI workloads attach CPU and core cloud services. We are also installing higher-capacity equipment in the same megawatts, so newer generations of accelerators increase token throughput and revenue potential. Costs are higher per megawatt as well, but revenue potential is higher. So we expect a combination of higher attach rates, more inference services beyond GPU-as-a-service, and higher token capacity in our equipment to increase ARR per megawatt on an incremental basis.
Your next question comes from the line of Tom Blakey with Cantor.
I think it's maybe a dovetail off of Sanjit's question. Could you just talk about maybe the pricing impact to this very strong ARR number, the net new ARR number that you reported this quarter? And then maybe give an update to the megawatt cadence that you're looking at here in calendar '26. As you mentioned you're a little bit ahead of plan, I'm just wondering if there was any details you can give us about 2Q '26 and if we're still looking for 25 megawatts in the second half.
On the megawatt cadence, we've got 15 megawatts remaining in the data center we discussed. We announced the 10-megawatt Kansas City facility was launched already, and the remaining 15 are in one facility that we had said would come on in the second half. It's on track and we expect those to come online over the balance of the year as we had expected. On the pricing impact to the net new ARR, it was modest in Q2. As Paddy mentioned, we raised list prices across the board for on-demand and spot instances, but much of that had already been captured through renewals or reallocation of capacity. So it had very little impact on the $93 million in net new ARR for the quarter. I don't want the takeaway to be that pricing alone created the blowout quarter — that is not the case.
Yes, to reiterate: pricing had a very modest impact in Q2 and is baked into our guidance for the rest of the year. The quarter's strength was driven primarily by demand, platform adoption and expansion from high-quality customers rather than a one-time pricing effect.
Your next question comes from the line of Jackson Ader with KeyBanc.
I was just curious about what exactly is baked into the out-year outlook. If I think about all the activity that you signed or contracted in the second quarter and the impact either here on '26 or '27, is it right to assume that we're at 155 megawatts, the majority online by the end of '27, and any incremental activity in the next few months is incremental to expectations for 2027? Or do you already have line of sight into activity that's coming down the line that is factored into what you're expecting for the 2027 numbers?
That's a great question. We're careful to provide a measured and appropriately conservative outlook based on capacity we've already communicated. Were we to add incremental capacity or deals beyond what we've articulated, there would be upside. From a 2027 impact standpoint, you're getting late in the year to significantly change calendar year 2027 capacity because data centers typically take roughly a year from lease signature to revenue generation. So near-term additions are more likely to impact exit growth rates rather than full-year calendar 2027 revenue. That's part of why we haven't provided formal 2027 guidance yet — there are a lot of moving parts. But the momentum is real: we increased our 2026 guidance and elevated the exit growth rate, and we've got a strong RPO backlog and are actively pursuing additional capacity. All of that points to upside for 2027 beyond our prior estimate, but it's too early to put a precise number on it.
And your last question comes from the line of Radi Sultan with UBS.
Just one quick one: how do your customers use your AMD deployments versus NVIDIA? And Matt, can you speak to how you see the mix between NVIDIA GPUs and AMD in deployed capacity? Also, can you comment on unit economics on a per megawatt basis for AMD compared to NVIDIA GPUs?
We have a healthy mix of different types of accelerators in our fleet. For competitive reasons, we don't disclose detailed breakdowns by vendor for which models run on which hardware. It is a mix, and we continue to keep pace with the innovation in the market. We are very good at taking whatever hardware is available based on capacity and running state-of-the-art models. The software optimization layer we continue to build and refine helps us be hardware agnostic. On unit economics for specific hardware types, we don't disclose the unit economics of different hardware throughputs publicly.
We have reached the end of our Q&A session. I will now hand the call back to Radu.
Great. Thank you, Paige. Thank you, everyone, for joining, and this concludes our second quarter earnings presentation and conference call. Apologies we couldn't get to all your questions, but we look forward to speaking to everyone later in the day on our follow-up calls.
Thank you.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.