管理層發言
Greetings, and welcome to the Americold Realty Trust Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Rich Leland, Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.
Good morning, and thank you for joining us today for Americold Realty Trust's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. In addition to the press release distributed this morning, we have filed a supplemental financial package with additional detail on our results. These materials are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.americold.com. This morning's conference call is hosted by Americold's Chief Executive Officer, Rob Chambers, along with Chris Papa, our Chief Financial Officer. Management will make some prepared comments, after which we'll open up the call to your questions. Before we begin, let me remind you that management's remarks today may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, assumptions and beliefs as well as information available to us at this time and speak only as of the date they are made. Management undertakes no obligation to update publicly any of these statements in light of new information or future events. During this call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, including NOI, same-store NOI, core EBITDA, net debt to pro forma core EBITDA and AFFO, among others. The full definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures are contained in the supplemental financial package available on the company's website. Please note that all warehouse financial results are in constant currency and reflect the second quarter 2026 same-store pool unless otherwise noted. Now I'll turn the call over to Rob for his prepared remarks.
Thank you, Rich, and thank you all for joining our second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. I'm pleased to report that our team delivered another strong quarter. And this morning, I'd like to walk you through our financial results and some of the encouraging trends we are seeing across the industry. I will also highlight the significant progress we've made against each one of our five key priorities as we continue to build momentum and strengthen our foundation for future growth. Our second quarter results demonstrate two important trends. First, we are continuing to see ongoing signs of stabilization across the industry. Second, the resiliency of our business model, combined with strong execution, market share gains and continued progress against our key priorities has Americold well positioned to win in this environment. Starting with the financials. Second quarter AFFO per share came in ahead of expectations at $0.35 per share. Delivering on our financial commitments is paramount to this management team, and this marks the fourth consecutive quarter of AFFO per share that either met or exceeded analyst consensus. Similar to the first quarter, all key operating metrics materialized in line or better than our original outlook, further reinforcing our conviction that the industry continues to stabilize and our ability to gain share during the process. I'm particularly encouraged by the continued positive trends we are seeing in physical occupancy levels across our portfolio. We saw growth beginning in Q1 of this year, and this continued sequentially as we move through the second quarter. In a typical year, inventories are generally flat to slightly down from Q1 to Q2. However, we saw our physical occupancy increase over 200 basis points sequentially, and inventories grew nearly 300 basis points on a year-over-year basis. While this is certainly encouraging regarding the broader industry trends, it is also evidence of our ability to leverage our scale and operational expertise to gain market share in this environment. Last year, we won a record amount of new business, and we're now seeing the benefits flow into our warehouses as inventory ramps from those new wins. Additionally, in the current environment, we believe we are winning more than our fair share of new business as some of the smaller capital-constrained players continue to struggle operationally and are beginning to exit the industry, while the level of new project announcements has slowed materially. Customers that may have given some of these new market entrants a try are coming back to Americold due to our strong history of service, reliability and operating excellence. From an economic occupancy perspective, we came into the year expecting some contraction as customers reevaluated their space requirements in the soft consumer demand environment. Here, too, we are seeing results come in ahead of expectations as economic occupancy was up year-over-year in the second quarter. Additionally, because of the increase in physical inventories, we saw the gap between physical and economic occupancy tighten by 240 basis points. The current 860 basis point gap reflects a healthier and more sustainable long-term level. While we are not waiting for a demand recovery, all of these trends point to an increasingly stable environment, and we continue to believe that we should see a return to more normalized seasonal trends as we progress throughout the year. Beyond occupancy, we were also encouraged to see that our pricing for the second quarter increased year-over-year for both storage and handling. While the environment remains competitive and many of the smaller players continue to use price as their only way to win new business, our commercial teams are executing extremely well and leading with the Americold value proposition. We believe that operating and service excellence will be even more important to customers in the future as the industry continues to stabilize and eventually returns to growth. You can see this reflected in both our churn rate, which remains low at 2.1%, and in the consistency of our storage revenue from fixed commitments, which remained stable at 58% for the quarter. We continue to remain disciplined in our approach to pricing, prioritizing long-term value creation and contract quality over short-term volume gains. The fundamental benefits of the fixed commitment structure continue to provide a compelling value proposition with 100% of our top 25 customers, who account for over 50% of our total revenues, utilizing our fixed committed contract structure. Beyond our financial performance, I also want to highlight some of the significant accomplishments that our team delivered during the quarter to strengthen our foundation and set us up for long-term success. You will remember that we entered the year focused on five key priorities for the business. Since then, we have delivered meaningful progress in each of these areas. First is our initiative to delever the balance sheet. I'm very pleased that during the quarter, we received regulatory approval to proceed with the closing of our previously announced $1.3 billion strategic joint venture with EQT. Our teams are working through the final closing conditions, and we expect to have the transaction completed in the third quarter. They have been a fantastic partner and truly understand the mission-critical nature of our assets and the embedded growth opportunities across our portfolio. I look forward to expanding this platform in the future with new opportunities, and I believe that having a strong capital partner like EQT will be a strategic advantage for Americold going forward. Chris will provide additional details in a few minutes, but we expect to use the proceeds from this transaction to repay approximately $1.1 billion of our outstanding debt, resulting in a substantial reduction in our total leverage. In addition, during the second quarter, we also amended our revolving credit agreement to extend the maturity date out to 2031. As a result of these actions, we are making significant progress towards improving our balance sheet and enhancing both our liquidity position and financial flexibility. Maintaining our investment-grade rating is an important objective for us, and Moody's recently reaffirmed our rating and outlook, further validating the progress we have made. The second of our five key priorities is to create value from our real estate through active portfolio management. During the quarter, we sold two previously idled facilities for total proceeds of approximately $27 million. Both facilities will be removed from the cold storage industry, eliminating 31,000 pallet positions. Since launching this initiative last year, we have exited a total of 10 underperforming facilities and have an additional 15 that have either been idled and are awaiting exit or actively being marketed for sale. Additionally, last quarter, we expanded this initiative to include a review of our more recent development projects. Based on the projected return assumptions, we announced late last month that we have mutually agreed with the customer to wind down operations at our Lancaster and Plainville facilities and strategically reallocate the capital to other more productive uses. From a capital allocation perspective, these properties were not meeting our return expectations and would have required additional investments in capital, time and resources to fully ramp. Their current contribution to NOI was negligible. In conjunction with this closure, we have reached a broader commercial agreement with the customer to extend and expand their business at other assets across our network. We recorded a $298.8 million noncash impairment charge in the second quarter, and we'll be classifying these facilities as held for sale starting in the third quarter and have already listed both buildings for sale. In total, we have the potential for substantial future cash proceeds from buildings we intend to exit with several hundred million dollars of properties currently listed for sale. These actions reflect our commitment to allocating capital to assets and opportunities with the strongest risk-adjusted returns. By cleaning up the portfolio, we expect to have a healthier and more productive mix of assets to generate long-term sustainable returns for shareholders. One area where we continue to see interesting growth opportunities is in underpenetrated sectors as we continue to extend our capabilities into adjacent and complementary areas of the temperature-controlled supply chain. This is our third key priority. Already this year, we have successfully won new business that established our retail footprint in Europe as well as expanding our QSR and convenience capabilities in Asia Pacific. We are also continuing to see new business wins in adjacent sectors, including e-commerce and pet food. During the quarter, we renewed our long-standing relationship with Good Ranchers, a direct-to-consumer protein provider that has grown rapidly over the past several years. They have expanded from a single site to now using five facilities across our network to distribute products nationwide to their growing customer base. These wins reinforce our operational expertise in handling fast-turning product and is aligned with the broader growth trends in direct-to-consumer business and the humanization of pets that our top customers have discussed on their public earnings calls. These initial entries deepen our integration with customers and enhance our value proposition beyond traditional storage and handling services, further demonstrating our ability to pivot to new growth opportunities when customer demand trends shift. While still early, we believe these opportunities will drive incremental growth over time and further differentiate Americold from its competitors, especially the smaller players who lack the resources to invest in the capabilities and technology necessary to support customers in these more operationally intensive sectors in the market. Our fourth priority is to focus our development spend on a limited set of lower-risk customer-driven projects. Last quarter, we announced a new $163 million plant adjacent project dedicated to McCain Foods and anchored by a 20-year fixed commitment agreement. We were also excited to announce the June grand opening of our facility in Port St. John, Canada, which was developed in partnership with both CPKC and DP World. This integrated import/export facility is the first of its kind globally to combine the rail, port and cold storage expertise of CPKC, DP World and Americold in a single location. This is a unique solution that creates a new way of moving temperature-sensitive products between inland production regions and international markets. Similar to our focus on adjacent categories, these strategic partnerships help diversify our business and provide additional unique growth opportunities for Americold that are difficult to replicate. Finally, our previously announced expansion project in Dallas-Fort Worth remains on budget and on track for an opening later this year. Our fifth priority is to rightsize our cost structure and transition to a more efficient overhead model while maintaining our focus on operational excellence. Earlier this year, we completed the first phase of this initiative, which was designed to deliver approximately $30 million in annual savings, primarily in indirect labor. Thus far, we have reduced our indirect headcount by 400 positions, which is over 10% globally. During the second quarter, we announced our fit-for-purpose initiative, which builds on this progress with an additional $25 million of targeted savings by the end of Q1 2027, focused primarily on SG&A and our support functions. This initiative is intended to unlock efficiencies enabled by our prior investments in labor and technology to drive clearer accountability, faster execution and stronger performance across the organization. We are already starting to see the early benefits of these actions as SG&A was down year-over-year this quarter, more than offsetting the impacts of ongoing wage inflation across the business. Finally, I'm also pleased to announce that in early July, MSCI upgraded our ESG rating by four categories from BB to AA. This reflects the continued maturity of Americold's sustainability program and the cumulative impact of several years of focused work in this area. We have maintained a consistent approach centered on operational efficiency, governance, risk management and transparent disclosure. Congratulations to our ESG team on reaching this milestone and positioning Americold as a leader in sustainability. I am incredibly proud of our team and the momentum that we are building across each of our priorities. In an environment that continues to challenge many in our industry, our scale, operational expertise and customer relationships are allowing us to differentiate and win in this market. As a result of our outperformance in the first half of the year and outlook for continued positive trends, we are increasing our full year AFFO guidance to a range of $1.26 to $1.32 per share, an increase of $0.04 at the midpoint of the range. This is after absorbing an estimated $0.05 of dilution from the EQT joint venture as our strong execution in the base business has positioned us to more than offset any dilutive impacts from that transaction. Next, I would like to turn it over to Chris, so he can discuss the reporting changes you can expect to see in Q3 from the joint venture as well as the additional details of our financial outlook. Chris?
Thanks, Rob, and good morning, everyone. Before walking through the details of our outlook for the year, I want to clearly address comparability as our reported revenue, NOI and occupancy levels will change going forward due to the change in portfolio composition from the previously announced joint venture transaction with EQT. Importantly, underlying operating performance continues to improve in line with the trends we are seeing across the business. As Rob mentioned earlier, we remain on track to close on the joint venture later this quarter. As we communicated during our last call, Americold will contribute 12 assets to the joint venture with a total value of approximately $1.3 billion. As a reminder, this represents a blended cap rate of approximately 7% or nearly $3,300 per pallet position. Starting with our third quarter reporting, we anticipate recasting the same-store pool, and these 12 assets will come out of the total warehouse count and segment results. For your convenience and comparability, we have provided a pro forma version of the historical performance trend table on Page 31 of the supplemental to reflect the recast of the pool. You will remember that this is structured as a 70%-30% joint venture. So going forward, we will record our 30% interest in the JV's net income under the line item titled Income Loss from investments in partially owned entities on our P&L. In addition, we will earn an annual management fee plus receive reimbursement for pass-through operating expenses such as power, labor and other expenses associated with operating the facilities. Both the management fee and the reimbursement for the operating expenses will be recorded on a new line item within total revenues, and there will be other nuances in the accounting for the JV, which we will outline once the transaction closes. Similar to our disclosures for other minority-owned joint ventures, we will also add summarized financial information to the supplemental beginning in the third quarter, and our 30% share of earnings from this venture will be included in AFFO. As I mentioned earlier, as a result of the transaction, you will see lower reported results such as revenue and NOI as assets contributed to the JV will no longer be consolidated in those metrics. From a balance sheet perspective, the book value of the JV assets and related accumulated depreciation will be removed upon sale. We intend to use the proceeds from the transaction to repay approximately $1.1 billion of our outstanding debt. This includes all of our 2026 through 2028 U.S. dollar-denominated debt maturities. At the end of Q2, our total debt was $4.3 billion. So this $1.1 billion paydown would reduce our outstanding borrowings by approximately 25% and lower our leverage ratio by around three-quarters of a turn, providing us with increased financial flexibility and moving us closer to our target of 6x or less. The anticipated dispositions of our idled and held-for-sale assets in the future will also allow us to make additional progress towards this target. Now I'd like to discuss the details of our revised outlook for the year. As you think about our updated outlook, it is important to distinguish between reported results and the underlying performance trends. While our reported revenue and NOI will be lower as a result of the joint venture, the year-over-year operating trends are largely unchanged and in most cases, improving relative to original expectations. For modeling purposes, we are assuming that the transaction will close in the third quarter and note that the same-store guidance metrics assume the removal of the sites contributed to the venture. For same-store revenue, reported levels will be lower by approximately $230 million due to the updated asset base. However, underlying growth trends within the portfolio remain consistent with or modestly ahead of our prior expectations. Assuming the third quarter close for the JV, we now expect same-store revenue to land between $2.03 billion and $2.09 billion for 2026 or up slightly year-over-year at the midpoint based on the revised same-store pool compared to our expectations coming into the year for a revenue decline of approximately 2.5%. Similarly, same-store NOI will also be impacted as a result of the JV, but operating trends in the base business remain similar and are supported by our ongoing cost initiatives. We are now expecting same-store NOI in the range of $660 million to $695 million, with core EBITDA in the range of $570 million to $600 million. For interest expense, we are expecting approximately $155 million to $160 million for the full year, reflecting the benefits of the $1.1 billion debt paydown that I mentioned earlier. Our planning assumptions coming into the year assumed that we would see some pressure on both pricing and occupancy. At that time, we thought that economic occupancy could be flat to down 300 basis points for the year and pricing would be down by a blended rate of between 100 to 200 basis points. As Rob mentioned earlier, we have seen signs of continued stabilization in the industry and the results for the first half of the year have surpassed our original expectations. As a result, we are now forecasting these trends to continue for the remainder of the year. While the EQT joint venture is expected to create a headwind to AFFO of approximately $0.05 this year, we believe that the improvements in the base business will allow us to more than offset that impact. Given our performance in the first half of the year and the continued stabilization of industry trends, we are raising our full year AFFO guidance to $1.26 to $1.32 per share, an increase of $0.04 at the midpoint and more than offsetting the projected dilution from the JV. You will note that we have also included a comparison in the supplemental and in our investor deck that includes an unadjusted comparison for your ease in identifying the expected JV impacts. As I consider where the business is today, we are seeing strong evidence that our actions against the five key priorities that we outlined at the start of the year are delivering tangible results. We have made significant progress towards strengthening the balance sheet, advancing our portfolio management efforts, maintaining a disciplined approach to development and took meaningful actions to optimize our cost structure while continuing to service customers and win new business. We are not relying on a recovery in demand to create value. Instead, we are laser-focused on executing against the priorities that are within our control. The combination of disciplined execution, a stronger financial position and a gradually stabilizing industry reinforce our confidence in the outlook we have provided. We believe Americold is well positioned to deliver sustainable growth and long-term value for our shareholders. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Rob for some closing remarks.
Thank you, Chris. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, we are encouraged by the continued signs of stabilization that we are seeing across the industry, and I believe that Americold is well positioned to succeed in this environment. Our results in the first half of the year have come in ahead of expectations, and we are delivering against the commitments we communicated to you at the end of last year. Our financial results are beginning to reflect that execution, largely because of the strong team we have assembled. The momentum we're seeing across the business is a direct result of the dedication and execution of our associates around the world, and I remain confident that we have the right people and the right strategy to continue delivering for our customers and shareholders. Having now been in the CEO role for almost a full year, I think it's a great time to reflect back on the work we've accomplished over that time: four straight quarters either meeting or beating expectations, executing on a strategic joint venture with a strong partner to strengthen our balance sheet and provide future growth capital, strengthening our management team with the hiring of Chris as our CFO and the strong real estate experience that he brings to the company, actively managing our portfolio to identify the highest and best use for our properties while exiting low-performing sites, winning significant new business around the world that expands our capabilities into attractive new sectors and streamlining our cost structure to a more efficient overhead model. Looking ahead, our priorities remain unchanged: disciplined execution, advancing each of our five strategic priorities and delivering on our financial commitments to shareholders. We believe the actions we have taken over the past year have strengthened Americold's foundation and positioned the company for sustainable long-term growth and value creation. I remain confident in our team, our strategy and our ability to continue creating value for our customers and shareholders, and I look forward to updating you on our continued progress in the quarters ahead. With that, operator, we are ready to open the line for questions.
分析師問答
The first question is from Michael Goldsmith from UBS. Focusing on our financial commitments to shareholders, we believe the actions we have taken over the past year have strengthened Americold's foundation and positioned the company for sustainable long-term growth and value creation. I remain confident in our team, our strategy and our ability to continue creating value for our customers and shareholders, and I look forward to updating you on our continued progress in the quarters ahead. With that, operator, we are ready to open the line for questions.
Physical occupancy increased more than 200 basis points sequentially despite a period that's typically flat to down seasonally. It was also up 300 basis points year-over-year. So can you help us break that down a bit? How much of this improvement do you view as structural market share gains versus a temporary benefit from customer consolidation and inventory rebuilding? And then also, what gives you confidence that these occupancy gains can be sustained through the back half of the year and into 2027?
Yes. Thanks, Michael. Really appreciate the question. We were very pleased with performance across all of our key metrics for the quarter, and physical occupancy was certainly a highlight. As you mentioned, it was up 200 basis points sequentially, nearly 300 basis points year-over-year. First, we said at the beginning of the year that our customers had reached a point where their inventory was in line with demand, meaning there really wasn't a need for any further destocking like we had seen over the last few years. So that was a very encouraging message that we heard earlier in the year and pointed to stabilization from an occupancy standpoint. Why is it increasing? It's increasing because of our strategy and because of our execution. A big part of that execution was winning new business. We've talked a lot about it over the last 18 months. We've won a record amount of new business, and now we're seeing those volumes flow into our network. We also said, and this was one of our five key priorities that we were going to go after underpenetrated sectors. We've had great success there. We brought our retail capabilities to Europe and won new business with several large grocery retailers there, and our physical occupancy in that region is up significantly year-over-year. In Australia, we won the convenience business that's now ramping up and providing nice growth in that region. In North America, it's a share gain story: we took a different strategy 18 months ago than most of the rest of the market. Many industry participants cut rate as a way to drive volume, and we took a different approach. We let service win the day and held steady on rate. You see that in our numbers every quarter, and we knew that would come at the cost of some volume. Now we're in a position where we're appropriately paid for the service we're providing. Our customers are realizing the value of that best-in-class service, and they're coming back to Americold organically; our churn rate is really low. So it's great execution. It took conviction, but our strategy is clearly working. I believe it's sustainable market share gains and new business wins that are driving that physical occupancy growth.
The next question is from Michael Griffin from Evercore ISI.
I know Chris mentioned in his prepared remarks that the updated operating expectations expect trends to continue in the back half of the year. I was wondering if you can quantify that. Does that imply sort of flattish economic occupancy and maybe slightly positive growth on pricing? And then, Rob, as you look at the business more holistically, the economic-to-occupancy spread is about 860 basis points in the quarter. Is that a good run rate that we should think about going forward? I realize you're not relying on a recovery in demand, but do you think that this is a business that can get back to, call it, low-ish 80s economic occupancy over time? Do you think there could be a pickup? Curious about the ultimate trajectory of economic occupancy as well.
Sure. I'll hit on the second two and ask Chris to talk a little bit about guide expectations. As it relates to the spread between physical and economic occupancy, we were pleased to see that spread tighten within the quarter. Growth in economic occupancy with outsized growth in physical occupancy resulted in that gap coming in at a high single-digit percentage. I think that's a relatively stable expectation. There may be another 100 basis points or so of movement, but a high single-digit gap is reasonable and something we're comfortable with and our customers are comfortable with. As it relates to where occupancy can go longer term, we believe occupancy can get back into the low 80s. We were there for a long time and think there's the opportunity to return. We're doing the right things to balance disciplined pricing with winning new business. Our strategy is working and you can expect the ability for us to bring economic occupancy back up into the 80s over time. We're focused on that opportunity.
Yes. For expectations, we see things sustaining for the rest of the year, maybe picking up a little bit. It's within the range of our expectations for occupancy on a same-store basis to be improved from where we were. We originally said 0 to down 300 basis points. Now we're thinking it will be tighter, maybe up 100 basis points to down 200 basis points for the year. On revenue, we see it somewhat flat to maybe slightly positive for the year.
The next question is from Todd Thomas from KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Just wanted to follow up on some of that. Rob, it sounds like the majority of the increase in physical occupancy is new business because I think physical would be flat or lower sequentially otherwise. Are you seeing any signs of inventory restocking from your customers at this point? Similarly, throughput improved sequentially in Q2 and was higher year-over-year. Was that largely attributable to new customer wins as well and just having more volume ramping up and flowing through the warehouses? Or are you seeing an increase in throughput more broadly? What's the expectation for throughput to remain positive year-over-year as we think about the updated guidance in the second half?
Thanks, Todd. On throughput, it was great to see throughput up for the quarter and that's largely driven by new wins. We were intentional in bringing our retail capability more broadly across the portfolio, with big wins in Europe. The convenience store distribution wins are material in our Asia Pacific business; those are very fast-turning product. Growth in our e-commerce business has been outsized relative to the rest of the portfolio, another fast-turning type of business. So it's the new business wins that are driving higher throughput, which is impactful. The physical occupancy gains were a mix of market share and new business wins, driven by strong execution. We expect those trends to continue and are encouraged to see them heading in the right direction.
The next question is from Viktor Fediv from Scotiabank.
Chris, can you provide us with an update on the bridge from warehouse same-store NOI to total NOI? I understand it now includes equity JV, but non-same-store NOI appears to be contributing more meaningfully to guidance than originally contemplated. I think you said $15 million to $30 million as of the Q4 update. Also, what share did Lancaster and Plainville represent in that number at the beginning of the year and now?
If you look at the guidance we provided, you can see the change period-over-period. I would focus on the unadjusted columns to get a real view of what's happening with both same-store revenues and same-store NOIs. What you're seeing in the guidance is the JV properties coming out of that. If you look at the detail on Page 31, you'll see the breakout of the JV properties and it largely is similar. There is some non-same-store within the JV pool that is also coming out, which offsets that. Overall, our non-same-store properties have come down a bit and are reflected in the guidance. Some of that is due to market conditions; things are taking a little longer in this environment from a lease-up standpoint. We can provide more color offline if needed.
The next question is from Blaine Heck from Wells Fargo.
When you think about food costs and inflation, can you comment on how you're feeling about the latest statistics and trends along with your forward expectations or what you're hearing from clients about promotions? Are there any specific product areas that you expect to see better stabilization and others that continue to suffer most from inflation?
It's still a challenging environment. I'm proud of our execution because there hasn't been a big change since the beginning of the year in terms of food inflation, input costs, or the pressures lower-income consumers are facing. Much of that is consistent with what we described at the beginning of the year. Our customers are still dealing with higher input costs for their products, which makes it hard for them to roll back prices sustainably. Consumers haven't received a lot of relief yet from inflation or higher interest rate costs or pump prices. There are some green shoots: wage rate growth for lower-income consumers has been growing pretty significantly over the last quarter, which is good to see. Our customers are spending a lot on promotional activity to try to drive volume. Another factor that helps with safety stock is that customers continue to innovate to adapt to shifting consumer trends. We've seen activity in higher-protein SKUs, higher-fiber SKUs, and lower-serving-size SKUs — all of that drives incremental safety stock even if it doesn't necessarily drive overall grocery store volume sales. We're not counting on a big demand recovery to achieve our guidance. If we were to see one, it would represent upside to our plan and to next year. We're focused on controlling what we can, and the quarter results show physical occupancy up, economic occupancy up, throughput up, storage rate up, handling rate up and G&A down. That's strong execution.
The next question is from Brendan Lynch from Barclays.
Just a couple on the Lancaster and Plainville assets. Can you talk a little bit about the prospective buyers, if you anticipate these will be run as cold storage facilities going forward? And how should we think about your development of automated facilities going forward as well?
We're actively marketing those two buildings for sale. There's a broad base of potential interested parties: end users of the buildings and parties that could use them for a combination of cold and dry storage going forward. The buildings are listed for sale and there's opportunity for meaningful proceeds to be reallocated to other projects. We've strengthened our development platform over the last few years with great talent and expertise. You can see that in our track record of delivering recent development projects on time and on budget. Our focus on development remains unchanged other than it will be more refined to lower-risk projects from an underwriting standpoint with regard to leasing up and customer-dedicated projects. Our ability to execute has increased significantly.
The next question is from Nick Thillman from Baird.
Maybe following up on those lines regarding the Ahold termination. What concessions did you get out of the deal? Obviously, there's no termination fee associated with it. How many projects did they renew in? What terms did you get extended on existing fixed commitments? Regarding development yields, how much of the change you are now disclosing with those two assets being moved out of that pool is the yield change strictly from that mix shift? Or has there been any other shift in the overall yields on the current pool as well?
I'm not going to get into a lot of detail around the commercial relationship other than to say the relationship is very strong. This was a mutual decision, and we'll be relocating a significant amount of the volume that was in our Pennsylvania facility to another location within the Americold network. We're able to extend existing agreements we already had in other locations and expand other agreements in existing locations. The relationship remains very strong. Regarding development yields on other projects, delivery dates and upfront construction costs remain consistent across the rest of the projects in the schedule. It's a testament to our team's ability to deliver projects on time and on budget. We took a more conservative view on some rate expectations given the current market versus when some projects were underwritten, but outside of that, no other material changes.
The next question is from Alexander Goldfarb from Piper Sandler.
As you expand into QSR, pet food, floral, candy and these adjacent sectors, who are you finding is the competition? Are these large entrenched competitors or a lot of small mom-and-pops? Trying to get a sense as you expand what sort of competitive set you'll run into.
Across the board. We see opportunities to take share from smaller competitors in traditional cold storage and more specialized areas like pharma, floral and pet food. In many instances, some of this business is handled by the end customer, and there's a compelling value proposition to outsource it. In other instances, it's larger, more entrenched competitors where customers are looking for new ways to change and shift the business model. Americold can help in those instances as well. Early success in many of those cases is encouraging.
The next question is from Michael Carroll from RBC Capital Markets.
Rob or Chris, can you discuss how the EQT JV impacts the same-store trends? It looks like the unadjusted same-store NOI growth is up about 250 basis points versus your prior guidance to about down 2.2%. Does EQT move these numbers around? For example, are the assets contributed to the JV expected to be above or below that specific target implied in guidance?
If you look at the recast pool, we're forecasting same-store revenues around negative 1.1% to positive 1.8% and same-store NOI around negative 5% to just positive 0.1%. If you look at Page 31, you can back into the results for the JV itself. For the full year, the JV should be around down 1% overall on revenue, and on NOI could be down about 60 basis points. So it's inside the range. Remember that pool is a more defensive pool and is more highly occupied, so I think that's representative. The supplemental pages provide the detail needed to reconcile these numbers.
The next question is from Craig Mailman from Citi.
Big picture: you guys are talking a lot about things normalizing, and your peers are saying the same, which is positive. You had basically a $0.10 gross guidance increase offset by the EQT JV. But a lot of that $0.10 increase was the G&A savings, over 80% looking at the $25 million depending on timing. Your fixed commits renewals are going 12 to 18 months versus five years. You took that big impairment on the Ahold assets and didn't extract a lot of lease term fees. I'm trying to get a sense of where we are in the power dynamic of landlord versus tenant because it feels like tenants are comfortable rolling the dice and not locking in and landlords generally are still in the protect occupancy phase. Correct me if I'm wrong or add clarity on what you think of the business cycle and where we are in the recovery stage.
Let me correct one thing: the guidance increase is a result of our occupancy outperforming expectations, pricing on storage outperforming expectations, pricing on handling outperforming expectations and throughput outperforming expectations. The G&A savings are not what drove the favorability in the near term; much of the savings will be realized between now and the first quarter of next year. Where we are in the cycle is consistent with what we've said: a stabilized environment where demand and inventories are aligned and demand is off a relatively low base. We've not seen significant improvement yet, and we're not counting on a big demand recovery to achieve our guidance. We're focused on what we can control, and our results demonstrate strong performance and execution. If the environment improves, that represents upside to our guide and to 2027. We're comfortable winning in this current environment and have been over the past year.
The next question is from Mike Mueller from JPMorgan.
A couple quick number questions. One, why does CapEx guidance stay steady and not decline as NOI does post-EQT transaction? And can you talk a bit about power cost: what's driving those components and the time to pass through?
We held our CapEx guidance where it is. As we prioritize projects during the year, we felt comfortable leaving it as is even with the joint venture. From a power cost standpoint, we're seeing cost pressures on rate across the board. We have mechanisms to pass through adjustments for increased costs; those mechanics can vary by contract, but we try to do this and keep on top of it in all our contracts.
You saw storage rate per pallet flip from slightly down in Q1 to up in Q2. That's largely driven by power surcharges. We focus on operational opportunities to keep power from escalating beyond expectations, but in the current environment it's a year-over-year headwind. We have to pass that through, and that's what you're seeing on the storage rate per pallet.
The next question is from Rob Simone from Compass Point.
Longer-term thought: after this JV and especially if you get back into the 80s on physical and economic occupancy, there's a path where your consolidated balance sheet can get sub-6x leverage quickly. Up until now, it's been executing and getting to that point. What comes next? Once you hit that mark, how do you think about priorities for capital allocation beyond that once you're more conservatively levered?
You're right: the EQT JV is a huge step to stabilize the balance sheet. From here, it gives us flexibility to continue delevering through singles and doubles rather than needing a significant one-off. Organic growth, cost savings, and development projects already spent that will add EBITDA without more investment all help delever the balance sheet meaningfully. From there, we'll prioritize things that create the most shareholder value. There remain development opportunities with customers that support growth. If the industry sees dislocation, there could be strategic M&A opportunities if seller expectations are realistic. There's no shortage of opportunities once we feel comfortable, and we're well on our way.
The next question is from Vince Tibone from Green Street.
Can you provide a little additional color on what actually took place with the Ahold facilities? What made them unique and ultimately caused them to fail versus other automated facilities you recently developed that were successful and fully operational today?
We expanded our portfolio management review to include development projects. These buildings were designed in 2019 by prior management teams and featured very complex retail automation that doesn't look like the automation used in most facilities that support traditional food manufacturers. They had many unique requirements. The Pennsylvania facility was operational but not ramping in a manner that met our return expectations or some service level agreements with the customer. Connecticut was a similar sister facility. We made the decision with the customer to unwind both. We thought it prudent to reallocate capital to high-performing assets and opportunities; we have many successful automated facilities across our portfolio. This action gives us a healthier, more productive mix of assets going forward and allows us to focus capital on higher-return opportunities. I'm excited about the customer relationship going forward and glad to have these behind us.
This concludes the question-and-answer session as well as today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.