Prepared remarks
Hello, and welcome, everyone, joining today's TIC Solutions Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Operator provided instructions. Please note, this call is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to turn the meeting over to Andrew Shen with Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call. Joining me this morning is Ben Heraud, our Chief Executive Officer; Kristin Schultes, our Chief Financial Officer; and Robbie Franklin, Executive Chairman. I would now like to remind you that certain statements in the company's earnings press release and on this call are forward-looking statements that are based on expectations, intentions and projections regarding the company's future performance, anticipated events or trends and other matters that are not historical facts. These statements are not a guarantee of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In our press release and filings with the SEC, we detail material risks that may cause our future results to differ from our expectations. Our statements are as of today, August 6, 2026, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements we may make, except as required by law. As a reminder, we have posted a presentation detailing our second quarter financial performance on the Investor Relations page of our website at ticsolutions.com. Our comments today will also include non-GAAP financial measures and other key operating metrics. The required reconciliations of non-GAAP financial metrics can be found in our press release and in our presentation. For the purposes of this call, we refer to our segments as Inspection and Mitigation, or I&M, Consulting & Engineering, or C&E, and Geospatial or GEO. Any reference to combined results reflects a non-GAAP combined view of legacy Acuren and legacy NV5, where applicable for a period-to-period comparability. More details on the calculation of the combined results are included in the presentation. It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Ben.
Thank you, Andrew. Good morning, everyone. I want to take a moment to thank our shareholders for their continued support and our team members across the organization for their hard work and dedication to our clients. Our second quarter demonstrated solid execution across the platform. We delivered double-digit growth in Consulting & Engineering, strong growth in Geospatial and improving commercial indicators in Inspection & Mitigation as we enter the second half of the year. Cross-selling is working across the business and margin expansion is underway with consolidated adjusted EBITDA margin improving year-over-year as we progress towards our long-term target of 18%. Our services are in high demand. Aging infrastructure across the globe requires sustained investment in inspection, engineering and geospatial services. Growing energy demand is driving investment in power delivery, grid reliability, LNG and other energy infrastructure. Increasing data consumption supports the construction, commissioning and technical services required for data centers. Finally, the digitization of the physical world is increasing demand for the data, analytics and asset intelligence capabilities that help clients better plan, operate and maintain their critical assets. These megatrends reinforce the strategy we outlined at our Investor Day. We are building a more integrated company, increasing our exposure to attractive end markets, expanding our capabilities across the asset life cycle and improving margins through a more favorable service mix, higher utilization, cost discipline and improved opportunity selection. We are also executing on our strategy to expand geographically where we have established technical capabilities and strong leadership. Our M&A pipeline remains active, and we see a number of compelling opportunities ahead that we expect will expand our geographies, end markets and capabilities in ways that are complementary to the existing platform. We continue to build on our position as a tech-enabled life cycle partner, supporting clients from planning through construction and ongoing operations. Bringing those capabilities together allows us to address a broader portion of client needs than a single service provider can. We are receiving positive feedback from clients as they learn more about the breadth of our capabilities. In many cases, clients have been pleased to learn that we can support multiple needs across the asset life cycle. We are seeing this model translate into commercial results as cross-selling becomes a TIC-wide opportunity with our teams engaging clients across multiple service lines. This is expanding our scope of work and creating opportunities that would not have existed as separate businesses. That momentum is reflected in our record combined C&E and GEO backlog, which increased 20% year-over-year to $1.18 billion, providing high visibility as we enter the second half of 2026 and into next year. A recent example illustrates how this works in practice. A municipal client awarded us multiple assignments to support the life cycle of its bridges and water pump stations, including the development of digital twins to assist with Engineering, Inspection & Mitigation. The work translates asset data and condition assessments into actionable engineering and operating programs, positioning our Inspection teams to support the resulting work. It also creates a repeatable model that we can take to bridge and infrastructure owners globally. That is the integrated platform working as intended. Next, our focus on essential high-demand end markets continues to accelerate our growth and margin expansion goals. Our buildings end market increased 28% year-over-year to $115 million in the quarter. Our industrial manufacturing and metals business grew over 40% to $56 million, while power and utilities increased 11% to $90 million. Aerospace and defense also saw significant momentum with revenue up over 40% to $10 million. These markets benefit from long-term investment requirements and technical complexity, and they align well with the breadth of our platform. Technology and AI are also creating opportunities to be more efficient across the business. TIC Solutions operates at significant scale with thousands of active client engagements, a productive field workforce and complex technical workflows across our 3 segments. We have a number of AI initiatives underway to improve knowledge access, streamline workflows and accelerate decision-making. For example, our procedure knowledge assistant allows field technicians to query internal procedures, while our engineering report assistant helps engineers search and summarize historical reports so prior technical knowledge can be applied more efficiently to current projects. We're also using document intelligence tools as a second set of eyes across contracts, purchase orders, RFPs and certifications, helping identify inconsistencies, risks and potential compliance issues. Over time, we expect the cumulative benefit of tools like these to support utilization, cost discipline and margin expansion. With that, I'll turn to segment performance, beginning with Consulting & Engineering. Consulting & Engineering delivered record second quarter revenue of $207 million, up 16.8% from the prior year. Growth was driven by continued strength in power and utilities, buildings, infrastructure and data centers, reflecting both favorable end market exposure and solid execution across the segment. Aging infrastructure is driving ongoing investment in highways, water, transportation and related public assets. Rising electricity demand is supporting spending across power generation, transmission, distribution and grid modernization. Larger developers are executing substation programs at scale, moving sequentially from one project to the next, and we are well positioned and winning in this space. Recent wins include grid hardening work for a 230,000-volt transmission infrastructure, demonstrating our team's highly technical capabilities and a multiyear agreement with a large California utility, representing one of the most expansive awards in the power business unit's history. Battery storage is an additional area of growing activity as clients increasingly pair power generation with storage investments. The depth and breadth of our power delivery capabilities, combined with the demand we are seeing, gives us confidence in the long-term growth of this end market. Data centers remained a significant contributor to growth. Trailing 12-month revenue reached $98 million, and our data center backlog has grown to over $110 million, providing strong line of sight into the second half of the year. We continue to layer in additional services as clients invest in mission-critical capacity, reliability and expansion. Overall, C&E continues to benefit from attractive structural demand, differentiated capabilities and a growing ability to serve clients across a broader set of technical needs. Turning to Inspection & Mitigation. Second quarter revenue was $297 million, down 5.5% from the prior year. As discussed on our prior earnings call, this performance was contemplated in our Q2 guidance and primarily reflected 2025 site losses, along with the timing of planned outage work that shifted from the second quarter into the second half of the year. While the quarter was below our long-term expectations for the segment, commercial indicators have significantly improved. Call-out work grew during the quarter, and we were awarded multiple new run and maintain sites and meaningful new awards supporting client capital projects. Our open commercial proposal pipeline for the next 12 months is robust and supports our expectation for stronger commercial momentum through the balance of the year, and we were encouraged to see June revenue turn positive year-over-year. Power and utilities, industrial manufacturing and midstream oil and gas infrastructure continue to show healthy demand. We are also extending the I&M platform into attractive adjacent end markets and geographies, including an emerging position in data centers and traditional infrastructure. As the combined platform grows, we are bringing I&M's inspection and integrity management capabilities to complementary asset classes, creating more opportunities to connect these services with our C&E and Geospatial offerings. Bridges and traditional public infrastructure represent a meaningful expansion of I&M's addressable market. We recently began a multiyear bridge Inspection and NDT engagement, bringing our inspection and integrity management capabilities to transportation assets for the first time at scale. The North American bridge market is large and aging and ongoing public safety and asset condition requirements create the same recurring mandated demand that underpins our core industrial business. We see this as a repeatable model that broadens the long-term opportunity for the segment. The team remains focused on converting this commercial momentum and opportunities into attractive end markets and into profitable growth through disciplined pricing, selective work pursuit, stronger regional accountability and more effective deployment of resources. As we move through the second half of 2026, we expect I&M to benefit from normal seasonal activity, continued site win conversion and further progress in commercial execution. The segment is positioned to return to a more consistent growth profile while maintaining margin discipline. Turning to Geospatial. The segment continued to be a strong performer in the second quarter with revenue of $81 million, up 7.9% from the prior year. Second quarter growth was primarily driven by power and utilities clients with additional momentum across our broader private sector markets. We are encouraged by that progress, which reflects the continued diversification of the segment across end markets and client types. We also completed a major high-profile pilot for federal offshore mapping during the quarter. The project integrated vessel-based survey work, autonomous underwater vehicle imagery, seafloor data collection and physical sample recovery of mineral-rich seabed nodules across a complex deep sea environment. The work supports national priorities related to domestic supply chain independence for rare earth and other critical minerals. It also reflects the technical depth of our Geospatial platform and our ability to serve as an integrator on complex assignments. Given the successful execution of this marquee project, we expect this work to result in significant follow-on opportunities as these programs move towards a broader operational phase. Improved margins in the quarter reflected project mix and timing. GEO revenue and margins reflect the timing and mix of large fixed-fee contracts, which can create variability between periods. We remain focused on asset utilization, disciplined project execution and growing the contribution from higher-value commercial and analytics work over time. We are also investing in technology-enabled digital asset management solutions that help clients convert geospatial data into more actionable information for asset planning, monitoring and maintenance. Overall, TIC Solutions is well positioned to benefit from the continued digitization of the physical world, spanning the built and natural environments. Growing demand from utility, infrastructure and commercial clients for better data and decision support plays directly into our capabilities, and our geospatial offerings can strengthen the broader platform by enabling more integrated data inspection, engineering and asset management solutions across the business. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Kristin to review our financial results, provide an update on integration and offer more detail on our outlook.
Thank you, Ben, and good morning, everyone. Unless otherwise noted, all prior year comparisons reflect results on a combined basis. C&E and Geospatial reflects legacy NV5 results and I&M reflects legacy Acuren to provide a more meaningful view of year-over-year performance. Our second quarter results were in line with our internal expectations. This was led by Consulting & Engineering and Geospatial, which delivered strong growth and margin expansion. Total second quarter revenue was $584 million, up 3.3% from $566 million. Growth was 3.2% in constant currency and organic growth was 2.5%. While reported growth was below the long-term potential of our business, record combined backlog, improving I&M commercial activity, favorable end market exposure and cross-selling momentum support stronger and more consistent growth over time. Adjusted gross profit was $223 million, up 7.1% from $209 million. Adjusted gross margin was 38.2% compared with 36.8%, up 135 basis points. The margin expansion reflected commercial selection and favorable business mix in C&E and GEO as well as improving operating execution across the platform. Adjusted SG&A was $129 million or 22.1% of revenue, compared with 21.2% last year. The increase reflected higher incentive compensation, indirect labor, legal reserves, benefit costs and overhead from acquired businesses, offset by net synergy savings. We remain focused on improving SG&A leverage through cost management, integration initiatives and growth across our business. Adjusted EBITDA was $95 million compared with $89 million in the prior year period. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 16.2% compared to 15.8%, reflecting a 40 basis point improvement and progress towards our margin expansion goals. Second quarter adjusted diluted earnings per share was $0.10. Turning to segment results. Consulting & Engineering contributed revenue of $207 million, up 16.8% year-over-year, with adjusted gross margin of 47.2%, up 75 basis points. The improvement reflected favorable mix and improved operating execution. Inspection & Mitigation generated second quarter revenue of $297 million, down 5.5% year-over-year. As Ben discussed, we had strong growth in call-out work during the quarter. This was more than offset by an approximately $30 million combined impact from 2025 site losses and known shifts in planned outage activity. These factors were contemplated in our second quarter outlook. I&M adjusted gross margin was 28.3%, down 45 basis points, primarily due to lower outage activity in the period, which carries higher margins. Geospatial contributed revenue of $81 million, up 7.9% year-over-year, with adjusted gross margin of 51.5%, up 360 basis points. The improvement reflected favorable mix and project timing. Given the mix of larger fixed fee contracts in the segment, GEO revenue and margins can vary quarter-to-quarter based on project timing and delivery schedules. For the first 6 months of 2026, total revenue was $1.072 billion compared with $1.034 billion in the prior year period. On a combined basis, revenue increased 3.7%, including 2.3% organically. Adjusted gross profit was $403 million or 37.6%. Adjusted EBITDA was $153 million, representing a margin of 14.2%. Adjusted SG&A was $252 million or 23.5% of revenue. For the first half of the year, I&M generated revenue of $532 million, down 3% year-over-year with adjusted gross margin of 26.6%. Consulting & Engineering generated revenue of $394 million, up 13.3% with adjusted gross margin of 47.4%. Geospatial generated revenue of $147 million, up 6.3% with adjusted gross margin of 51.3%. From a capital deployment perspective, we completed 3 bolt-on acquisitions during the quarter, adding technical capabilities and broadening our geographic density across the platform. Capital expenditures were $20 million during the second quarter and $25 million for the first 6 months, approximately 2.4% of year-to-date revenue. During the quarter, we repriced our $1.6 billion term loan, reducing our interest rate by 25 basis points and reducing annual cash interest by approximately $4 million. We also repurchased approximately 1.9 million shares at an average price of $8.33 per share for a total of $16 million under our previously announced share repurchase program. These repurchases reflect our confidence in the long-term value of this business and our focus on high-return investments. Turning to the balance sheet. As of June 30, total liquidity was $474 million, including $362 million of cash and $112 million of available capacity under our revolving credit facility, net of letters of credit outstanding. Bank-calculated net leverage was 3.7x, with the increase primarily reflecting the seasonal working capital build and our share repurchases during the quarter. The second quarter is typically our largest use of cash, reflecting the seasonality of this business. As collections catch up with revenue in the second half, we expect cash conversion to increase. For the full year, we anticipate net interest expense of $95 million to $105 million, cash taxes of $25 million to $30 million and capital expenditures of $50 million to $65 million. We manage and evaluate free cash flow primarily on a full year basis, and we continue to expect healthy free cash flow generation over the full year. Turning to integration. The team has worked collaboratively over the past year to build a scalable integrated back office. That work continues to translate into measurable results. I want to thank the team for their continued effort and commitment. As of June 30, we have actioned $20 million worth of annualized run rate savings, up from $17 million at the end of the first quarter, and we remain on track to deliver the full $25 million run rate program by year-end. We recognized approximately $6 million of savings through the first half and expect approximately $15 million of realized savings in the full year of 2026. Turning to our outlook. We expect third quarter revenue of $610 million to $630 million and adjusted EBITDA of $100 million to $110 million. The outlook reflects improvement across I&M, including planned outage work, run and maintain activity and project demand, along with continued strength in Consulting & Engineering. Year-over-year, this represents 9% revenue growth and 16% growth in adjusted EBITDA at the midpoint. We are reiterating our full year 2026 guidance of $2.15 billion to $2.25 billion of revenue and $330 million to $355 million of adjusted EBITDA. As we continue to unlock the full potential of our business, we look forward to providing further updates next quarter. Our leading indicators are healthy. Our backlog is at a record level. Proposal and commercial activity remains strong and the integration program continues to generate both cost and commercial benefits. With that, I will turn the call to Robbie for his thoughts.
Thank you, Kristin. The second quarter reinforced our conviction in the strategy we outlined at our Investor Day and supports our investment thesis in bringing together Acuren and NV5. Record backlog, early cross-sell results and continued synergy execution are tangible evidence that the integrated platform is creating value beyond what the businesses could generate independently. We are also executing with discipline on capital allocation. During the quarter, we reduced our cost of debt, opportunistically bought back 1.9 million shares and continue to build out the platform through strategic acquisitions. Our objective remains clear: deploy capital efficiently to strengthen the business while continuing to deleverage the balance sheet. The landscape for acquisition opportunities remains robust, and we have been disciplined in our approach to inorganic growth to strengthen our service offerings and geographic reach. The results this quarter support our confidence in the earnings power of the platform and the achievability of the long-term targets we have communicated. We remain focused on scaling the business responsibly, improving margins, converting earnings to cash flow and reducing leverage over time. With that, I'll turn the call back to Ben.
Thank you, Robbie. Before we open the line for questions, I'll highlight 3 key takeaways from the quarter. First, our life cycle model is delivering. Cross-selling activity is increasing, and we are capturing new and expanding scopes of work that further strengthen client relationships. Second, the trajectory of inspection and mitigation is improving. Site and project wins are increasing, commercial momentum is building, and we expect the segment to benefit from planned outage activity and continued conversion of the opportunity pipeline in the second half. Third, our end markets remain supportive. Demand across infrastructure, data centers, utilities and industrial markets is resilient, while our record backlog provides strong visibility as we enter the balance of 2026. We remain focused on the long-term objectives shared at our Investor Day, including our 3/18/85 goal of $3 billion in revenue and 18% adjusted EBITDA margin and 85% free cash flow conversion by 2029. The progress this quarter on margin expansion, synergies, commercial integration and capital allocation supports our confidence in those objectives and in our full year 2026 guidance. I want to thank our teams across the organization for their focus on clients, execution and operating discipline. With that, operator, we are ready to take questions.
Questions and answers
Operator will now open the line for questions.
Just keep going on the cross-selling. I know you're just starting to tap that cross-selling opportunity. Is there any way to put, kind of, an approximate value on the cross-selling revenue expected in '26 and a growth factor in '27? Is it having any meaningful impact on organic growth this year? Or just trying to size it a little bit better.
Yes. While we're not reporting on the cross-selling numbers themselves, it is showing up in the record backlog numbers that we're talking about and the end market exposure that each of our segments are now getting through the cross-selling program. There are many examples of the great projects that we're winning because of the breadth of our services under this combined platform. The momentum that we're getting in the connective tissue in the company is really starting to show up in those cross-selling results.
Got it. And the 9% CAGR you guys outlined at Investor Day, I think Consulting & Engineering, 7% to 9%; Geospatial, 5% to 8%. So in terms of visibility over the next 12 months, is one have meaningful higher visibility than the other? Just trying to, kind of, understand how you're looking at it in the near term? And the second part of that question was, I know Geospatial has bounced around a little bit quarterly. The assumption is still that's likely to happen over time.
Yes. With GEO, because of the large fixed price contracts, that does move around a little more than the other segments. C&E is performing extremely well. With that backlog being up 20%, we've got really strong visibility into its continued growth. And I&M, we're very pleased to say it's on year-on-year growth now after June and we continue to see that moving ahead. So pleased with that. And I think we're very happy to see I&M contribute to our overall growth as we move through the second half of the year and into next.
We'll turn now to Kathryn Thompson with Thompson Research Group.
Just first focusing on Consulting & Engineering segment was up 17%. Good to see strength there. Can you give a little bit more color on the levers for growth in that segment? In other words, more color on organic. You had mentioned cross-selling previously. How much did that play through and overall growth? And any other factors that we should take in consideration for driving that mid- to high teens growth?
Yes. Thank you. Obviously, we're very happy with that growth. Data centers is driving a lot of it. But if you remove data centers from the growth, it's actually still growing at a pace of about 7%. The vast majority of this is organic. If I were to point to other areas, power and utilities and infrastructure are in line with these megatrends we talked about at our Investor Day. And cross-selling within the segment is contributing to the growth. There's still plenty of runway for us to capitalize on that.
And Kathryn, we're also focused on utilization. We're seeing some improvements in utilization in Consulting & Engineering as well, which is driving growth. Additionally, the M&A pipeline is extremely robust, and there are a lot of attractive opportunities in the consulting and engineering space, which will help accelerate growth as well.
Yes. Really large addressable market there for us.
Okay. Perfect. And you had indicated previously that there are improving indicators in the Inspection segment. What are these? And just maybe a little bit more color on that.
Yes. The June performance being up year-on-year is notable; it's the first time we've been able to say that in a long time. We're also able to talk about new sites we're winning, which is very positive momentum. Many of those were in the Gulf Coast. We're taking price where we can on contracts. The structural changes we have made are starting to shine through.
This is part of the plan and the model we built. A big piece was the ramp effect of the site losses.
Okay. Perfect. And finally, just on backlogs up 20%. Where are you seeing those by project, by segment and by end market?
It's quite broad across the business. Data centers represent a large portion. Other areas include buildings in general, aviation, healthcare, power and utilities, infrastructure and industrial. Aerospace and defense, while small, has been growing nicely for us recently.
We'll turn now to Josh Chan with UBS.
I guess the legacy NV5 businesses seem to be growing much faster than maybe the long term or at least historically. So do you feel like you're in a period where those businesses can have a stronger-than-normal growth driven by some of the factors that you're talking about?
I think the backlog is an indicator of future growth, and that's at record levels; it's up 20%. The C&E performance in the quarter was very strong and we feel very good about its growth moving through the quarters and into next year. The market tailwinds — digitization of the physical world, aging infrastructure and pressure on the power grid — are driving the business. We are well positioned to capitalize on these trends.
Sure. That's great to hear. And maybe a follow-up on data center. Historically, that business has been more APAC oriented, but I think you mentioned some growth in the U.S., too. So are you having more success coming into the U.S. and doing work here?
Yes, we are. It's now 25% of the revenue and continuing to grow as a proportion. Trailing 12 months revenue is just under $100 million. It's a bright spot, and I&M is starting to see some exposure to the space. We're rapidly seeing growth there, very small at the moment but pleasing to see. That's cross-selling starting to work.
Excellent. That's great to hear and congrats on the good quarter.
We'll move now to Andy Wittmann with Baird.
So I just want to ask a couple of questions on the guidance and then maybe an accounting question. As I look at the guide here, it implies just a slight step-up to hit the midpoint in the second half of the year. The I&M timing slippage out of Q2—previously you said in Q3, now you're saying second half. Has that work started now? Or has it been scheduled? I'm trying to see the visibility you might get on that. Obviously, I heard the comments on commercial indicators, but there was some defined work that's been slipping. I'm just wondering the status. Is that one of the key variables that causes some of the acceleration you're implying here to the midpoint of the second half guidance?
Yes, absolutely. The teams are ramping up for that work as we speak.
Thanks, Andy. Our second quarter results enhanced our confidence in the full year guidance. When we launched the guidance earlier this year, we talked about 4% top line growth and 10% growth to adjusted EBITDA. The assumptions included winning new sites in I&M — we are winning new sites in I&M. We planned on growing backlog in C&E and GEO — we're growing backlog at 20%. We planned on improving margins with the synergy program and utilization — we are seeing that with 40 basis points of improvement in the quarter. We also planned on diversifying end markets. Largely, the year is playing out as we planned, and we're excited about a strong delivery for the year.
Got it. On the margin side, the second half implied margin percentage is in the high 16s at the midpoint, which is a good ramp over the first half. Besides synergies and seasonality, are there other drivers? Is it just mix and execution? How would you define what needs to fall into place to hit that second half margin level?
Good question. There's a little over 100 basis points of improvement baked into the second half. I would put it in the category of mix and execution. We are seeing growth in higher-margin end markets, improvement in utilization and KPIs internally point us in that direction. We take internal forecasting seriously and have been thoughtful about the guidance.
Okay. And a detailed accounting question: on Consulting & Engineering, there's the one-year measurement period for acquisitions to mark the value and profitability of fixed price contracts to market. In this quarter, it appears you revalued some contracts which increased goodwill, decreased contract assets and increased contract liabilities. Does this relate to specific projects? Is this a factor to Q2 cash flow because these contracts seem to be costing more than originally expected? Also, is there an effect on normalized gross margins? Do you know or estimate the benefit to gross margins from these contract adjustments?
Thank you for the detailed question. We have one year as a measurement period on an acquisition. This is a very large acquisition, and it's not uncommon to have measurement period adjustments in the first year. This relates to project accounting from the legacy NV5 business. I would chalk it up more to accounting noise. The $20 million you mentioned on goodwill is on a $3 billion balance sheet goodwill and intangible line item. The offset was contract assets and liabilities; it had an immaterial impact from a P&L perspective in the quarter. It is not projected to have an impact on gross margins going forward.
We'll hear now from Alex Rygiel with Texas Capital.
Can you speak to any headwinds you're seeing that might be impacting your business from AI? And is there any scenario where larger players like yourself increasingly take share from smaller players that may not have the capital to keep up with the investment needs to create AI tools?
We see AI as a long-term opportunity. As we do bolt-on acquisitions and implement AI, it's something we can layer in and increase the value of those businesses. We're leaning into AI and deploying it on multiple work streams. We haven't seen it impact pricing or our ability to win work. We're excited about it. We're using AI to improve efficiency both in shared services and the back office, and we have examples flowing through our engineering work. I was with one of our structural engineers recently who described the ability to leave AI working on drawings overnight and pick up from there the next day. It's exciting.
That's great to hear. I also felt increased excitement regarding M&A. Could you give more color? Are sellers more interested in selling because of macro conditions? Are pricing dynamics more favorable to buyers? Any color would be helpful.
Thank you. We're passionate about M&A. At Investor Day we laid out a model reflecting deploying between $100 million and $150 million of capital towards bolt-on M&A annually. We're very confident in our ability to do that this year. We closed 3 small ones during the quarter. Sellers typically like our story: we're a forever home for their business, providing career opportunities for their teams and accelerating growth. We closed a smaller acquisition just last month, and we've seen teams deploy cross-selling, resource sharing and equipment sharing effectively. Multiples on these smaller deals remain accretive, around 5 to 7x, so very positive.
We'll move now to Jeff Martin with ROTH Capital Partners.
I wanted to touch on the funding environment. A lot of the C&E is agency driven. In GEO you're focused on growing the commercial opportunity. Could you discuss the agency funding environment? Also, any look under the hood on when follow-on opportunities with that rare earth project might start to come in?
On follow-on opportunities, we have three active discussions around additional areas we could explore from the offshore mapping pilot. The pilot being proved out creates potential privatized work and positions us well to support work in regions where we identify rare earth minerals. GEO diversification is working: our commercial work was up 13% year-over-year in the quarter. Power and utilities are a big driver for diversifying away from federal work. Regarding the funding environment for agency-driven C&E, we're not seeing a slowdown. The backlog points to continued demand driven by megatrends like aging infrastructure and increased electricity demand. This is essential work and we're well positioned to do it.
Very good. My other question is on LNG. There are some large opportunities down the pipeline. Any update and timing color would be helpful.
LNG was a bit of a drag through the first half, but it's starting to ramp up. We have very high backlog of work for the next three years for that business. With what's going on in the utility space and LNG being a hot topic, it's driving work for that group. In I&M, we just landed a $30 million multiyear MSA for LNG work. That sets us up for a strong 2027.
We'll turn next to Stephanie Moore with Jefferies.
I wanted to circle back on organic growth. Could you talk about volume and pricing performance in the quarter and updates on pricing opportunities going forward? Also, what's the cadence of organic growth in the back half? I believe you'll be lapping some contract losses in August. There's cross-selling activity brewing, so I would love to get a sense of cadence and momentum through the back half.
For I&M specifically, technical yields — the amount we're getting per hour — are up, so we are taking price where we can and that supports organic growth. We lapped the lost sites in August, so we're already starting to see year-on-year growth, which should compound as we win new sites. For other segments, our backlog is a great indicator of organic growth moving ahead. It reflects the follow-on work clients give us based on performance.
Perfect. And on M&A, great to see tuck-in deals. As you think about consulting or I&M, where is your risk appetite for incremental M&A in either side or both?
If you think of total addressable market, C&E is very large and will provide many opportunities. We expect more opportunities there, but there are also many in Geospatial and I&M. In the long-term, C&E is likely where we'll see most opportunity.
Stephanie, we're focused on using M&A to execute our business strategies, whether that be geographic expansion, additional solutions or exposure to end markets. That will be across all three segments. We have a large addressable market and a broad target universe. We're being targeted and specific about where we have the highest ROI for the total business.
We're thoughtful about selecting acquisitions that have the highest return from a cross-selling and growth perspective. It's about strategic fit and upside for growth versus which segment it's in.
We'll hear now from Brendan Shea with JPMorgan.
I wanted to ask about I&M. Revenue was down 5.5% year-over-year on site losses and outage timing. Beyond the second half seasonality recovery, what supports a return to consistent growth? How much is structural versus deferred into second half? And can you share leading indicators that confirm your conviction?
If you set aside the outage and site losses, the business was up 4% in the quarter, which points to strength across the segment. We're now able to talk about new sites we've been winning and year-on-year growth. The pipeline of new sites is the highest I've seen since being involved with the business, and the team is on the front foot commercially. I recently attended a leadership meeting and the collaboration and cross-working are indicative of a strong turnaround.
On scaling I&M into bridges and public infrastructure: how do margins compare to recent high 20s I&M adjusted gross margin? What incremental fixed-price execution risks and mitigants should we underwrite?
Growing into higher-end markets like bridges is part of our strategy and leverages relationships across the combined platform. We do see higher margins in these opportunities.
One service line within I&M — work done at heights and rope access technologies — was up almost 10% in the quarter, and that's another area demonstrating diversification within the segment.
As there are no additional questions in queue at this time, I'll turn the floor back over to management for any additional or closing comments.
Thank you, everyone. Thank you for your questions and your continued interest in TIC Solutions. Before we close, I'd just like to leave you with a few final thoughts. We're really starting to see the full potential of this combined platform being unlocked. The cross-selling is working. Our backlog is at record levels, and all our segments are diversifying into new end markets. I'm extremely proud of the way our teams are collaborating and the entrepreneurial spirit is running deep in this organization, and it's really showing up. So thank you, everyone, and have a good day.
Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude today's event. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at this time, and have a wonderful rest of your day.