Prepared remarks
Good day, everyone, and welcome to the i3 Verticals Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded, and a replay will be available starting today through May 14. The number for the replay is (412) 317-0088 or (855) 669-9658 and the code is 6088860. The replay may also be accessed for 30 days at the company's website. At this time, for opening remarks, I would like to turn the call over to Clay Whitson, Chief Strategy Officer. Please go ahead, sir.
Good morning, and welcome to the Second Fiscal Quarter 2026 Conference Call for i3 Verticals. Joining me on this call are Greg Daily, our Chairman and CEO; Rick Stanford, our President; Jeff Smith, our CFO; and Paul Christians, our Chief Revenue Officer. To the extent any non-GAAP financial measure is discussed in today's call, you will also find a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure by reviewing yesterday's earnings release. It is the company's intent to provide non-GAAP financial information to enhance understanding of its consolidated GAAP financial information. This non-GAAP financial information should be considered by each individual in addition to, but not instead of, the GAAP financial statements. This conference call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements, among others, regarding the company's expected financial and operating performance. For this purpose, any statements made during this call that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. You are hereby cautioned that these forward-looking statements may be affected by important factors, among others, set forth in the company's earnings release and in reports that are filed or furnished to the SEC. Consequently, actual operations and results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Finally, the information shared on this call is valid as of today's date, and the company undertakes no obligation to update it, except as may be required under applicable law. I'll now turn the call over to the company's Chairman and CEO, Greg Daily.
Thanks, Clay, and good morning to everyone on the call. We are pleased with our performance in the second quarter as we continue to execute against our strategy and further improve the quality of our business. Revenue from continuing operations grew 6% year-over-year and annualized recurring revenue increased 12%, which we continue to believe is the best indicator of our long-term growth opportunity. Across each of our public sector markets, we are investing thoughtfully in products and capabilities where we see opportunities. For example, we continue to find compelling opportunities to invest in the Justice Tech market to help courts modernize and capitalize on their own revenue opportunities. However, we are seeing opportunities for cost control and margin expansion among many of our highly durable products. Importantly, the process improvements and the efficiency initiatives we've been driving through the organization are beginning to show up in our operating model. While we continue to invest for growth, we believe these efforts position us well for margin improvement as we move through the remainder of fiscal year 2026. We remain well positioned from a balance sheet perspective, which gives us the flexibility to pursue all manner of capital allocation opportunities. Overall, we're encouraged by the momentum we're seeing across the business and remain confident in our ability to create long-term value for our shareholders. With that, I'll turn it over to Jeff to walk through the financial results in more detail.
Thanks, Greg. The following pertains to the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, which is the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Please refer to the slide presentation titled Supplemental Information on our website for reference with this discussion. You will see we have retooled our presentation of revenue. We believe this clarifies our recurring revenue and simplifies the categories investors track while maintaining visibility in the important trends in the business. Revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 increased 6% to $57.5 million from $54.1 million for Q2 2025, principally reflecting revenues from two acquisitions, which have not yet annualized. Organic revenue was flat in the quarter, hampered by a $2.2 million decrease in professional services. The ongoing weakness in professional services continues to be concentrated in our utilities market, and we expect this to continue through the remainder of the fiscal year. Overall, nonrecurring revenue sources decreased 11% compared to the prior year. Annual recurring revenues increased 12% to $183.5 million for Q2 2026 compared to $164.5 million for Q2 2025. SaaS revenues grew 37% and transaction-based revenue grew 7%. We expect elevated levels of SaaS growth for the remainder of the fiscal year and accelerating transaction-based revenue growth. Overall, 80% of our revenues in the quarter came from recurring sources. Most of our expected software license sales for fiscal 2026 have been recognized, and we expect lower levels for the remainder of the year. Adjusted EBITDA increased 5% to $16.6 million for Q2 2026 from $15.8 million for Q2 2025. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenues was 28.8%, a decrease from 29.3%. Similar to last quarter, the percentage decline was driven by the previously mentioned investments in our Justice Tech market, higher hosting costs and lower professional services revenues. While professional services margins are relatively lower, the associated costs can lag revenue fluctuations. We expect the adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue to improve for the remainder of the year, and our long-term expectation remains 50 to 100 basis points of improvement per year. Corporate expenses as a percentage of revenues were 9.3% for Q2 2026. Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 increased 10% to $0.32 from $0.29 for Q2 2025. Again, please refer to the press release for a full description and reconciliation. Balance sheet, at quarter end, debt stood at $81 million, and our cash balance was $7.1 million. We still have $319 million of borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility with a 5x leverage constraint. The expectation remains that we will use any borrowings for opportunistic acquisitions and stock repurchases. The following updates our guidance for continuing operations for FY 2026, which was previously set forth in our first quarter fiscal 2026 press release dated February 5. The outlook does not include acquisitions that have not been announced or transaction-related costs. Revenue, $221 million to $229 million; adjusted EBITDA, $61 million to $65 million; adjusted diluted earnings per share, $1.09 to $1.15. We expect recurring revenues to continue to grow at a double-digit rate through the remainder of FY 2026. However, our view of nonrecurring professional services has deteriorated further, leading us to guide down the midpoint of our revenue range. Greg and I have alluded to margin strength in the back half of the fiscal year. You can see that in our guide as we expect to hold closer to our previous guide on EBITDA despite the lower revenue expectations. Looking past 2026, we expect better growth in 2027 and beyond. To highlight several discrete items that will compound with our normal growth algorithm, ongoing boarding of courts in West Virginia and other states on our CMS platforms and other transaction-based revenues will continue to feed excellent ARR growth in our Justice Tech market. In our transportation market, near the end of fiscal 2026, we will turn on two long-delayed transaction-based revenue opportunities, the impact of which will be felt in 2027. In addition, the insurance verification acquisition we made on January 1 continues to accelerate, and we will add multiple new state contracts in this fiscal year and the next. While professional services is not our preferred revenue source, we always pursue ARR when given the chance. We expect the professional services line to be far more stable than it has been in 2026. Our long-term expectation of organic revenue growth remains high single digit. From a seasonality standpoint, we currently expect our revenue distribution for the remaining two quarters to approximate the following: Q3, 48%; Q4, 52%. I will now turn the call over to Rick for additional business-related comments.
Thank you, Jeff. Good morning, everyone. This past quarter, we continued our focus on AI-powered capabilities that create measurable value for the government clients we serve by strengthening the core platforms they rely on every day. Our core platforms serve as systems of record containing critical IP-sensitive data and are designed with deep domain knowledge and experience. An example of our AI-powered capabilities is our newly released ad hoc query and reporting tool, which allows users to extract meaningful insights from their existing data using natural language without requiring lengthy custom report development or IT involvement. At last month's IUCX conference, which is the leading utility customer experience conference for electric, gas, water and wastewater utilities, the response to this new set of tools was immediate with clients requesting access on the spot and citing the ability to compress what had been a multi-day reporting cycle down to minutes. In addition, our AI-assisted document analysis and management platform brings the same philosophy to unstructured content, enabling clients to ingest, separate, extract, redact and search documents throughout their entire life cycle, providing our customer workforce with the tools to improve the value of their existing data and documents with an auditable AI-assisted workflow. In both cases, human review remains at the center of the process, ensuring accuracy, traceability and compliance in the regulated environments our government clients operate in. What makes these capabilities particularly valuable is that they are designed as a platform architecture, not isolated point solutions. That distinction matters in an AI-driven market. Both tools are architected to layer on top of any product within the i3 enterprise, which means the value compounds as adoption grows. For example, a client using our transportation or Justice Tech solutions today can extend these AI capabilities across their existing workflows without disruption to their data models or existing integrations. This positions i3 to expand the value of existing relationships within our installed base while simultaneously making our platform more compelling to net new clients who are prioritizing durability, depth and long-term efficiency in their technology decisions. Beyond our client-facing products, we are seeing meaningful gains in how we build software today versus a year ago. We began with AI assistance across the enterprise, which in layman's terms simply suggests snippets of code to enhance overall code development, debugging and testing among other uses, and now have moved to AI agent tools that plan, write, test and modify code with minimal human intervention and increased our product development capabilities, allowing us to pursue opportunities that would have previously required difficult trade-offs and prioritization, such as new feature development and product releases. Both AI assistant and AI agent design tooling is elevating the user experience of existing applications and automated testing through Playwright is improving our reliability and quality of our releases. Playwright allows us to create a library of automated testing scripts that would run on the cadence of our choosing without human intervention or action. Taken together, these investments are expanding what our teams can accomplish within a given sprint, letting us do more across our product portfolio without compromising on quality or execution discipline. We believe the work we're doing today in AI-powered product development will compound in value over time. It is deeply embedded in mission-critical systems and workflows our clients depend on, strengthening our capabilities and our long-term customer relationships. I'll now turn the call over to Paul for revenue updates.
Thank you, Rick. Demand across our core markets remained healthy in Q2 as government agencies continue to prioritize modernization, improved constituent experience and platforms that reduce long-term operational complexity. Across procurement and active opportunities, we continue to see three consistent buying patterns: broader solution scope beyond a single core system; preference for platforms that support integrated analytics, payments, transactional services and AI platform architecture that layer on top of existing features and benefits; and seeking vendors that can scale from local agencies to statewide deployments. These trends continue to favor i3's market-centric model and our ability to provide integrated platform solutions. From a commercial execution standpoint, we continue to see sustained interest across Justice Tech, transportation, education, and licensing and permitting, increased multi-module evaluations rather than single solution procurements, all with integrated analytics, payments, transactional services and AI-enabled workflows. Justice Tech remained one of our most active markets this quarter, supported by continued court modernization demand and strong alignment of our court case management system, jury solutions and transactional services. We saw increased customer engagement, reflecting agencies' urgency to reduce workload, modernize workflows and improve customer outcomes at both the state and local levels, creating increased interest in offerings that include payments, analytics, transactional services and citizen access. As i3 continues to expand and deploy our case management system footprint, we are seeing growing market awareness of the transactional services embedded in that ecosystem. Historically, case management system deployments served as the primary entry point with transactional service adoption following as customers became operational and more educated on their value. Over time, this created strong demand, but with long sales and implementation cycles typical of public sector system replacements. We are entering the next phase of this strategy. With the ability to offer transactional services independently of a full case management system deployment, we have introduced another commercial motion that accelerates time to revenue recognition. This approach allows agencies to engage with transactional services first, which drives revenue for the agency, generating pull-through demand for broader software adoption. As transactional services adoption grows, it strengthens our customer relationships and enables faster and more natural expansion into additional products and platform capabilities without requiring a full system replacement upfront. In transportation, market momentum continues to be supported by AI-enabled verification and enforcement workflows, proven deployments that validate scale and reliability and cross-sell opportunities, expanding our platform reach. Transportation continues to execute strongly within our platform-first strategy, delivering durable recurring revenue while deepening our role as a long-term modernization partner for motor vehicle, driver services and motor carrier agencies. We further strengthened strategically important customer relationships by securing multiyear support and maintenance agreements and delivering multiple large renewals with disciplined pricing, reinforcing platform stickiness and long-term pricing durability. Operationally, we remain focused on core platform execution and supporting future modernization efforts. As recent acquisitions have expanded—excuse me—our recent acquisition has expanded our footprint as the market-leading insurance verification provider while enabling tighter integration with payments and shared data services in the broader i3 platform. Across licensing and permitting in our public administration area, agencies continue to expand platform scope, building on core implementations. Commercial trends include broader adoption of licensing and permitting and compliance modules and an increased focus on citizen engagement and digital service delivery. These dynamics reinforce higher deal values and longer-term customer relationships and introduce AI as an accelerator. In the second quarter, we expanded adoption of AI indexing across new client agencies, demonstrating clear willingness among public sector customers to invest in practical embedded AI that delivers immediate operational value. These wins are also accelerating our broader sales actions, and we are compressing engagement timelines and driving significant pipeline expansion. In utilities, we continue to expand our platform capabilities with our i3 Unifi 360 customer information system and our Unifi 5.0 portal systems into a platform cloud offering. These capabilities, including real-time analytics, help agencies streamline operations, improve customer experience and reduce friction across billing, payments and service interactions. As adoption grows, we are seeing increased opportunities to extend these solutions through embedded payments and data services, reinforcing our platform approach and expanding long-term value within the utility market. Education continues to be a strong perennial performer for i3. This quarter, we opened up another state with the addition of Utah. We are also pleased to report that close to half of our new sales for fiscal 2026 so far are net new customers. In addition, we have operationalized AI in development, operations and product with near-term plans to augment our customer-facing AI-powered reporting tools. While deal timing remains product-driven, overall bookings activity reflects healthy deal flow across core markets, increased average solution scope for each opportunity, continued customer preference for SaaS delivery models augmented by integrated transactional services. Looking ahead, our commercial priorities remain centered on sustained pipeline and RFP growth with both new from new and new from existing clients, expanding solution scope within existing accounts and leveraging platform architecture AI capabilities as part of our sales and service delivery. This concludes my comments, Cindy. At this point, we will open the call for Q&A, please.
Questions and answers
Our first question comes from Madison Suhr of Raymond James.
I wanted to start just on the nonrecurring side. I know there's some headwinds this year, but you did call out high single digits is still the right way to think about the business. Just what gives you confidence that that's the right longer-term growth rate? And if you can also maybe just touch on what the key verticals are that you think can drive an acceleration back into that range over the medium term?
Thanks for the question, Madison. So we touched on this a little bit in the script. If you think about 2027, you started to kind of give a little bit of breadcrumbs on that. Specifically, the Justice market is going to continue to be a really strong ARR grower through that period. That business, with the West Virginia win, will really start to keep scaling and has really good prospects as they land and expand those courts. Our Resolve product, which assists with revenue generation for these courts, is absolutely the right product for the right time with a very deep pipeline right now and a lot of implementation in front of us. We're really excited about that. The transportation market also has a couple of really solid things going for it. A couple of long-term ARR items that have been years in the works and were long delayed are finally going live. That will be nice additive items. And then the most recent acquisition, we touched on this, but just to hit it a little more, they currently have five states in implementation and several more that are near line of sight. They have an incredible market position there with a strong right-to-win status as states implement solutions to proactively monitor insurance on their registered vehicles. They're in a great market position and it's going to be a great growth driver for the company. That's a couple of things that layer on top of our already existing growth algorithm. Outside of the net dollar retention growth algorithm, which we expect to remain around 103% to 105% and hopefully push a little higher, we were 104% this last year and do not expect significant changes there. The story this year and why the growth isn't up in that high single digits is the nonrecurring stuff. Our professional services specifically has gone from about $39 million to the current guide that expects somewhere more in the high 20s on an organic basis. We'll have a little bit of inorganic in there. That's what has been revised down from the initial guide. Looking to 2027, you don't have to expect that revenue line rebounds all the way back up to $40 million to see us getting back to a much better growth number that's in the high single digits, in line with our longer guidance. Even if that line maintains at the already depleted level, you're already kind of there. We have some opportunities in front of us and the give or take on that number is decently wide as always because it's nonrecurring. We have some attractive opportunities in front of us. Utilities, in particular, has been where some of the pain has been felt this particular year. That project is still very much moving forward, and we remain excited and convicted about the market opportunity. We've had to be a lot more patient than we would prefer, but we ultimately expect to get it done.
Okay. No, that's all very helpful color. I appreciate it. And then just a follow-up on the 2026 outlook. You did touch on this a little bit as well in your prepared remarks, but you took revenue down by about $3.5 million and EBITDA only down $750,000. So call it about a 20% decremental margin. So just as we think about expenses here, to the extent some of these nonrecurring headwinds persist, do you feel like you can continue to manage expenses to partially offset a big portion of those headwinds? And do you think some of these efforts you're doing now set you up well to be in that 50 to 100 basis points of normalized margin expansion in FY '27, assuming the revenue also is more in the normalized range?
Yes, absolutely. On margin specifically, as always, there's a mix of things going on within that. But we've highlighted this on the last couple of calls: as our professional services drops down, those costs lag a little bit on the revenue drawdown, especially in our utilities market, where we had a lot of third-party contractors engaged in projects that we were able to manage and mitigate. The same trends that we've been talking about for a little while are still present. We have been doing fewer acquisitions, and as a result, we have been continually tightening up and improving efficiency and processes all over the business in multiple pockets. We have been benefiting greatly from AI, and I think there's still more room to enhance there. That goes for a lot of different processes within the company — not just DevOps. There's probably not a single person within the business who isn't benefiting from this in some form. So you're able to do more with less; when you have attrition, you're able to consider whether to backfill roles. Cumulatively, that's adding up to a pretty attractive margin expansion situation. We expect margins to be stronger in the back half of this fiscal year. We still are making sure we invest in opportunities when we see those to run right through them, the Justice market being an example. So it's not all cost reduction. There are some pockets where we're accelerating and investing. But the net picture is one of attractive margin expansion for us.
The next question comes from Peter Heckmann of D.A. Davidson. You're able to consider whether to backfill roles. Cumulatively, that's adding up to a pretty attractive margin expansion situation. We expect margins to be stronger in the back half of this fiscal year. We still are making sure we invest in opportunities when we see those and run right through them, the Justice market being an example. So it's not all cost reduction. There are some pockets where we're accelerating and investing. But the net picture is one of attractive margin expansion for us.
As regards the recent acquisition in auto insurance verification, when you win a state there, do you automatically get 100% share of the state's business? Or is that something where potentially you're one of several suppliers and so you have to compete for share?
So the short answer is we would get 100% of their insurance verification. There's no scenario that we're aware of, and I think it's extremely unlikely that the state would ever try to bifurcate that. There needs to be a single system of record for civil penalties proactively being sent out when there's an uninsured motorist. That needs a single system of record, and that's our software. There's not really a scenario where you would bifurcate that. That being said, this is sold into the Department of Transportation. There's a lot of other software that the Department of Transportation needs, a lot of which we provide. So the added footprint we have here on the insurance verification improves our market position to provide other features: motor vehicle, driver's license, some of the fuel tax solutions, truck routing, all the different things that the Department of Transportation needs to provide services to its constituents. That's where the competitive landscape is.
Got it. Okay. And if I remember correctly, that acquisition already had something like 18 to 20 states. So just — I didn't write down whether you said you had three or five implementation. But can you talk a little bit about the number of states that company has live, how many are in implementation? And then does the revenue model — is it geared towards the underlying population of the state?
So we'll speak in broad numbers: we're in the low 20s at this point. We'll be in the high 20s, I think, when you look back in two years. The revenue model is, like a lot of our software, flexible. This is generally SaaS. There's some implementation revenues on the front end and SaaS, and that would be sized based off the size of the state generally. A larger state will pay more, but a smaller state isn't going to be proportionately much lower necessarily. We also have the opportunity to do transactional revenue here. This is another classic situation for i3 where this company could monetize payments and wasn't monetizing payments. It absolutely will go forward. We've already got two states lined up for that. They have a state that is very small that they monetize on a per-transaction basis, and that model has worked out really well for them. That state punches way above its weight relative to population. That won't be the only state on that model long run. We can also charge for the presentment of these. There are a lot of different levers we can pull. So we can be flexible and work with the state for what works with them in their budget situation.
Great. Great. So that one looks like it should be — as that falls into the organic calculation, that one also looks like it should be additive to organic growth.
Yes, absolutely.
Our next question comes from Alex Markgraff of KeyBanc Capital Markets.
A couple of questions. Maybe one for Paul and Jeff, just around some of the AI comments. I'm curious, it sounds like you all are doing quite a bit. Would just be curious to understand where you expect this to show up most materially in the model in the near to midterm, thinking about things like growth in existing relationships, new customer relationships, pricing retention, maybe implementation timelines. Just help us think about how that sort of materializes from a model standpoint based on what you're hearing on the ground?
I'll get started on it. We see it really early in the sales process, and we see the ability, because we've got a lot of domain expertise organized by market, to really hit the trigger points for where they're creating issues for our customers. So it typically will start with pain point reduction, and that may manifest itself in increased maintenance fees as we annualize on those conversations. It may manifest itself in specific pricing related to an AI deployment. It just depends on the customer and the particular process for how that's working. It also allows us — since the architecture is sitting on top of our existing products and is architected on top of our existing positions — to affect those more quickly than we would if we were doing pure stand-alone work that required deep integrations. I do think we're in the early innings of that conversation. It appears that as customers look at it and say, "Hey, we're excited and want AI exposure," in many cases they don't know what that means or how to go about it. So we're trying to focus on tangible value-add that can improve their operational efficiency or enhance their constituent experience, which then tends to open up another opportunity and another opportunity. As we run down the road, I think we'll have more opportunities, but it also puts a bit of pressure on us to continue to evolve consistently, and we're structured to accommodate that. So we're excited about it.
Just to the financial model, Alex, we are already experiencing benefits in the margin area, but also absolutely in revenue. Rick in his script highlighted a couple of discrete items where you're talking direct revenue that's a result of functionality that has been added to the software that would not have been possible in the pre-AI area — features and things that directly take advantage of these capabilities. The opportunities there are very large over the next several years. The pie of what can be delivered and the range of things that can be delivered to our customers has expanded greatly. Honestly, it touches a lot of other revenue too. In terms of what revenue is enabled by AI, in the not-so-far future it's going to be a broad part of our revenue base.
Got it. That's helpful. And then maybe just one follow-up on the sales front. I think I heard 50% or about half of sales this year from new customers. If I heard that correctly, maybe just a reminder how that sort of compares to the last couple of years?
Yes. That was for education, particularly. It's probably close to two times what their average would have been five years ago.
Education...
Hello, is anyone there?
Yes, we are here.
Yes, yes. Sorry about ...
This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Greg Daily for any closing remarks.
Thank you for your continued interest in the company. Stay tuned. We're excited about our pipeline and the team that we've put together. Thanks again, call us if you need anything.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.